arXiv:2605.01017v3 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: We introduce Xiaohongshu Social Comparison Reader Elicitation (XHS-SCoRE), a reader-grounded benchmark for detecting whether text-only Xiaohongshu...
By Hua Zhao, Jiapei Gu, Michelle Mingyue Gu
The paper introduces CSM-MTBench, a benchmark for evaluating machine translation on Chinese social media text. It addresses two main challenges: limited parallel data due to slang and stylistic nuances, and inadequate evaluation metrics that miss these informal features. The benchmark includes two expert-curated subsets—Fun Posts and Social Snippets—and proposes specialized evaluation methods for each, revealing significant differences among over 20 MT models in handling semantic and stylistic aspects.
By Kaiyan Zhao, Zheyong Xie, Zhongtao Miao, Xinze Lyu, Yao Hu, Shaosheng Cao
APRiL is an open‑ended benchmark designed to evaluate Chinese large language models’ social awareness. It comprises 2,196 evaluation instances across six categories, split into two tasks: Social Scenario Analysis, which tests understanding of social cues, mental states, and conflict structures, and Socially Aware Response, which checks whether models can generate appropriate, natural replies. Experiments on twelve models from six families show a consistent gap between understanding and response quality, indicating that stronger scenario analyses tend to improve response performance.
By Tian Lan, Han Zhang, Shanshan Wang, Yahan Yu, Jiang Li, Yugo Murawaki
Teochew has a substantial speaker community and exhibits distinctive lexical, syntactic, and pragmatic features, yet textual resources for evaluating large language models remain limited. We present T...
arXiv:2609.18156v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Teochew has a substantial speaker community and exhibits distinctive lexical, syntactic, and pragmatic features, yet textual resources for evaluating l...
By Jianan Wu
CIBuzzBench is a new benchmark that tests cross‑lingual understanding of Chinese internet buzzwords by providing 3,001 buzzwords with English explanations, equivalents, category labels, and harmfulness annotations. The benchmark defines three tasks—Meaning Explanation, Cross‑lingual Equivalent Matching, and Culturally Grounded Harmfulness Detection—to evaluate how well large language models translate and interpret these culturally nuanced terms. Experiments show that current state‑of‑the‑art LLMs still struggle with fine‑grained non‑literal meanings, robust matching, and accurate harmfulness detection across languages.
By Yifan Wang, Junyu Lu, Qifan Wang, Shun Zhang, Chaozhuo Li, Jiahao Liu, Zhijun Cao, Lingbin Bu, Fanliang Bu