arXiv Machine Learning By Thodoris Lymperopoulos, Ioannis Kakogeorgiou, Denia Kanellopoulou

XtrAIn: Training-Guided Occlusion for Feature Attribution

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

arXiv:2606. 10877v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Occlusion-based attribution methods provide an intuitive way to estimate feature importance by perturbing input features and measuring the resulting change in model output.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

arXiv Computer Vision
Aug 25

Where Not to Learn: Prior-Aligned Training with Subset-based Attribution Constraints

arXiv:2602.07008v5 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Reliable models should not only predict correctly, but also base their decisions on acceptable evidence. However, conventional supervised learning...

By Ruoyu Chen, Shangquan Sun, Xiaoqing Guo, Kangwei Liu, Sanyi Zhang, Zhangcheng Wang, Shiming Liu, Qunli Zhang, Wei Wang, Hua Zhang, Xiaochun Cao
arXiv AI
Sep 16

ResLRP: The Role of Residual Cancellation in Attribution Instability in Vision Transformers

The paper introduces ResLRP, an extension of Layer-wise Relevance Propagation that explicitly handles residual connections in Vision Transformers to prevent attribution explosion. It demonstrates that residual cancellation causes instability in ViT explanations, and that ResLRP improves faithfulness and localization across a wide range of ViT architectures, including Vision Language Models. The method also provides a diagnostic measure for predicting attribution degradation and successfully localizes Sparse Autoencoder features.

By Jim Berend, Reduan Achtibat, Daniel Sch\"affer, Alexander Binder, Wojciech Samek, Sebastian Lapuschkin, Maximilian Dreyer
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 18

Evaluating Explanation Methods by the Predictors They Induce

The paper proposes a new evaluation test for explanation methods: if an explanation accurately captures how a model uses its features, one should be able to reconstruct the model’s predictions from it. The authors convert explanations into predictors by summing feature effects and assess how well these predictors reproduce the model on unseen data, without any fitting. They apply this test to partial dependence plots, accumulated local effects, SHAP, and LIME across multiple datasets and model families, showing that the best method depends on feature dependence and that some existing quality metrics can favor flawed explanations.

By Jacob Selb{\ae}k, Hugo L. Hammer