TreeGraft introduces a multi-drafter framework that combines drafters of varying costs to build a shared draft tree for tree-based speculative decoding. The stronger drafter rescues and rescoring candidates from the weaker drafter, while a lightweight scheduler decides when to invoke the stronger drafter to manage cost. Experiments on 10 model pairs and 6 benchmarks show TreeGraft improves over the best single-drafter strategy by an average of 15.1% and up to 26.6%.
By Jiaming Fan, Daming Cao, Canchen Huang, Jiale Fu, Jin Zhang, Junjie Gao, Kai Yang, Xiangzhong Luo, Xu Yang
arXiv:2608.20375v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Tree-based speculative decoding raises the mean accepted tokens of standard speculative decoding by verifying multiple draft paths, and existing tree b...
By Xuming Ye, Zeming Ma, Runjie Yu, Yuan Liu, Tianle Li, Shuhan Bai, Jian Zhou, Fei Wu
arXiv:2609.22098v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Speculative decoding accelerates language-model inference by letting a cheap drafter propose tokens that the target model verifies in parallel. Recent...
By Huapeng Zhou, Huayu Wang, Xinyu Wang
The paper introduces AdaptiveSpec, a training‑free speculative decoding method that simultaneously adapts the per‑step verification rule and the draft‑tree shape using signals generated during decoding. It replaces the fixed token‑match rule with a margin‑based threshold and adjusts tree depth, width, and node count based on draft confidence and recent acceptance history, allowing the total draft count to vary. Experiments on SGLang show up to 56% throughput gains over EAGLE‑3 while maintaining 93% of lossless task accuracy on GSM8K, MATH‑500, and HumanEval across three models.
By Oszk\'ar Urb\'an, Young D. Kwon, Stylianos I. Venieris, Cecilia Mascolo
arXiv:2606. 00487v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Using a diffusion model for parallel drafting is a promising approach for speculative decoding.
By Zhuoyu Wang, Junnan Huang, Xinyu Chen
CAST (Cost‑Aware Speculative Trees) is a method that improves speculative decoding for large language models by packing multiple drafted token candidates into a tree and verifying the entire tree in a single target‑model pass, rather than only the top‑scoring chain. The tree width is adaptively chosen based on a latency measurement, ensuring that each added candidate’s expected gain outweighs its verification cost. Experiments across five domains, three GPU generations, and two model families show that CAST can be up to 43 % faster than the standard chain, while preserving the target model’s output distribution under both greedy and sampled decoding.
By Jungseob Lee, Sugyeong Eo