Hugging Face Trending Papers
When Should LLMs Abstain? Chain-of-Self-Questioning for Selective Risk Control
Read the original on Hugging Face Trending Papers →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at Hugging Face Trending Papers.
Related stories
arXiv AI
2d ago
When Should LLMs Abstain? Chain-of-Self-Questioning for Selective Risk Control
arXiv:2609.17516v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models can produce fluent answers when their factual support is weak. This paper introduces Chain-of-Self-Questioning (CoSQ), a prompt...
arXiv AI
Aug 18
I-CALM: Incentivizing Confidence-Aware Abstention for LLM Selective Answering
arXiv:2604. 03904v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) often produce confident but incorrect answers, in part because standard evaluation incentives reward guessing over expressing uncertainty.
arXiv AI
Jul 17
Simplicity Paradox: Debunking myths about prompting and datasets for LLM evaluation
arXiv:2607. 14109v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Probing the capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) and building robust solutions for Multiple-Choice Question Answering (MCQA) remain central challenges in natural language understanding.
arXiv AI
Jul 31
Ask don't tell: Reducing sycophancy in large language models
arXiv:2602. 23971v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Sycophancy, the tendency of large language models to favour user-affirming responses over critical engagement, has been identified as an alignment failure, particularly in high-stakes advisory and social contexts.
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 1
Who Flips? Self- and Cross-Model Counterarguments Reveal Answer Instability in LLMs
arXiv:2606.16011v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Standard accuracy benchmarks evaluate whether large language models (LLMs) reach correct answers. However, they do not test whether models maintain...
arXiv AI
Aug 25
Ask or Answer: A Decision Framework for Multi-Turn Health Misinformation Intervention
arXiv:2608.21721v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Correcting health misinformation in dialogue requires more than producing a factual rebuttal: users differ in what they know, what they believe, and wh...