When Does AI for PDEs Yield Scientific Evidence?
Read the original on arXiv AI →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv AI.
The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv AI.
arXiv:2607. 23753v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Partial differential equation (PDE) discovery aims to identify from data the governing law of a physical system.
The paper introduces a new type of data‑poisoning attack called a wrong‑physics backdoor, which tricks neural PDE operators into selecting a solution from the same PDE family but with an incorrect physical parameter. By relinking a surrogate input’s supervision to a cached alternate‑parameter solution, the attack keeps the output physically plausible yet wrong for the intended parameter. Experiments on 476 campaigns across several PDEs and models (FNO, DeepONet, Transformer, GRU, LSTM) show high success rates while maintaining low clean error, revealing a validation gap in current practices.
arXiv:2608.22026v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Accurate simulation of the long-time evolution of systems governed by partial differential equations (PDEs) is central to scientific computing. Among e...
arXiv:2512. 19643v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Numerical simulation of time-dependent partial differential equations (PDEs) is central to scientific and engineering applications, but high-fidelity solvers are often prohibitively expensive for long-horizon or time-critical settings.
arXiv:2508. 09156v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We present a framework for fine-tuning flow-matching generative models to enforce physical constraints and solve inverse problems in scientific systems.
arXiv:2602. 12706v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Neural operators have emerged as fast surrogate solvers for parametric partial differential equations (PDEs).