arXiv AI
When can we trust untrusted monitoring? A safety case sketch across collusion strategies
Read the original on arXiv AI →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv AI.
Related stories
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 11
Bootstrapped Monitoring: Leveraging Transparent Reasoning to Oversee Stronger AI Agents
arXiv:2606. 11998v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Trusted monitoring is a cornerstone of AI control.
arXiv AI
Jul 22
ResearchArena: Evaluating Sabotage and Monitoring in Automated AI R&D
arXiv:2607. 19321v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: As AI agents begin to automate AI R&D, we need ways to assess whether their outputs are safe to deploy, even when the agents themselves may be untrusted.
arXiv AI
Jun 6
Coding with "Enemy": Can Human Developers Detect AI Agent Sabotage?
arXiv:2606. 05647v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: AI coding agents are increasingly embedded in real-world software development, collaborating with human developers while gaining broader access to codebases and tools.
arXiv AI
Aug 5
Steganalysis of Adaptive Covert Collusion in Tool-Using Agent Populations: A Black-Box, Cross-Principal Approach
arXiv:2608. 02698v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Tool-using agents built on large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed not by a single operator but by many, side by side on shared infrastructure.
arXiv AI
Jul 10
Persuasion Attacks Can Decrease Effectiveness of CoT Monitoring
arXiv:2607. 08066v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Chain-of-thought (CoT) monitoring is a promising safety mechanism for AI agents, based on the premise that visible reasoning traces can surface misaligned or deceptive behavior.
arXiv AI
Jun 29
AI Snitches Get Glitches: Towards Evading Agentic Surveillance
arXiv:2606. 25836v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: To better assist users with completing challenging tasks, AI agents mediate communications, access data, and interact with different APIs.