arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 24

Can Vision-Language Models Analyze Human-Centered Video? Mapping Model Capabilities and Human-AI Collaborative Workflows

The paper investigates when vision‑language models (VLMs) can independently analyze human‑centered video and when human oversight is still needed. By reviewing 1,702 CHI 2026 papers, the authors develop a five‑dimensional taxonomy of video annotation tasks and build a benchmark of 15 representative tasks. Experiments show that VLMs alone achieve near‑human accuracy (HNS = 97.0), while human verification of VLM outputs yields the highest accuracy (HNS = 121.5) and significantly reduces annotation time and cost.

By Xiyuan Shen, Jiuyang Lyu, Seokhyun Hwang, Huanfen Yao, Shwetak Patel, Zhihan Zhang, Jacob O. Wobbrock
arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 3

Video2Reaction: Training Foundation Video Models to Predict Audience Reaction

Video2Reaction is a multimodal dataset that links short movie segments to the emotional reactions of viewers, gathered from social media comments. The dataset models reactions as distributions over categorical emotions, capturing the subjective and ambiguous nature of emotional perception. Experiments show that vision‑language models fine‑tuned with LoRA learn effectively from Video2Reaction and outperform specialized baselines, and that models pre‑fine‑tuned on this dataset transfer well to other emotion prediction tasks.

By Sidong Zhang, Trang Nguyen, Shiv Shankar, Gauri Jagatap, Deepak Chandran, Andrea Fanelli, Madalina Fiterau