arXiv AI By Sina Mansouri, Mohit Marvania, Vibhavari Ashok Shihorkar, Han Ngoc Tran, Kazhal Shafiei, Mehrdad Fazli, Yikuan Li, Ziwei Zhu

VeriSim: A Configurable Framework for Stress-Testing Medical AI Under Patient Communication Noise

Read the original on arXiv AI →

VeriSim is a configurable patient simulation framework that injects controllable noise across six clinically grounded communication dimensions while preserving patient medical records. It uses a verifier that extracts atomic claims from utterances and checks them against a UMLS‑grounded vector index built with BioLORD embeddings, relying on structured clinical metadata rather than surface‑text similarity. Stress‑testing seven open‑weight LLMs shows realistic noise reduces diagnostic accuracy by 15‑25 percentage points and lengthens conversations by 34‑55%, with smaller models degrading more than larger ones; expert ratings confirm VeriSim’s high truth, realism, clinical utility, and noise fidelity.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
Jul 29

PatientAgentBench: A Benchmark Framework for Evaluating Patient-Facing Health AI Agents

arXiv:2607. 25485v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Health AI is evolving from answering questions to agentic systems that converse with patients, reason about health records, and act on their behalf.

By Korosh Vatanparvar, Ashutosh Joshi, Maria Xenochristou, Mohammad Abuzar Hashemi, Prasad Kasu, Deepak Bansal, Daniel Lopez-Martinez, Anchal Nema, Ramya Ganesan, Will Kimbrough, Alex Woody, Yadunandana Rao, Dilek Hakkani-Tur, Wilko Schulz-Mahlendorf
arXiv Computation and Language
Oct 16

MindEval2: Clinically Grounded Patients and Rubrics for Evaluating Language Models in Mental Health Support

MindEval2 is a new evaluation framework for AI chatbots in mental health support, comprising Mental Health Quality Rubrics (MHQR) and the MindSim patient simulation harness. MHQR, developed with PhD-level psychologists, provides explicit, actionable criteria for assessing response quality, while MindSim offers realistic, longitudinal patient interactions with a memory component. The study evaluated 18 models, finding that although surface-level quality has improved, guidance calibration remains the main failure across all models.

By John Mendon\c{c}a, Daniel Tschernutter, Jos\'e Pombal, Areti Vassilopoulos, Catarina Botelho, Ignacio Sarasua, Maya D'Eon, Nuno Guerreiro, Ricardo Rei
arXiv AI
Jul 28

OpenAIs HealthBench in Action: Evaluating an LLM-Based Medical Assistant on Realistic Clinical Queries

arXiv:2509. 02594v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Evaluating large language models (LLMs) on their ability to generate high-quality, accurate, situationally aware answers to clinical questions requires going beyond conventional benchmarks to assess how these systems behave in complex, high-stakes clinical scenarios.

By Sandhanakrishnan Ravichandran, Shivesh Kumar, Rogerio Corga Da Silva, Miguel Romano, Reinhard Berkels, Michiel van der Heijden, Olivier Fail, Valentine Emmanuel Gnanapragasam
arXiv AI
Sep 25

Synthetic Hospital: An Open, Verifiable, Physician-Validated Longitudinal EHR Benchmark

Synthetic Hospital is an open, fully synthetic longitudinal electronic health record benchmark created from public medical education material. It contains 1,268 patients and 5,602 encounters, with every diagnosis, finding, and temporal relation grounded in standard ontologies and traceable back to its source. Physicians could not reliably distinguish its records from real charts, and current frontier AI models perform significantly below human experts on tasks such as reconstructing problem lists and summarizing charts.

By Christine Park, Valerie Chen, Tim Dettmers