arXiv Machine Learning By Sadanand Singh, Allam Reddy, Manan Chopra

Verifiable Rewards for Calibrated Probabilistic Forecasting

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

arXiv:2607. 00164v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards can in principle train calibrated probabilistic forecasters, since a proper scoring rule such as the Brier score is computed from outcomes alone and is minimized in expectation by the true probability.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

arXiv Machine Learning
1d ago

Do Your Own Research: Learning to Forecast by Learning to Search

The paper introduces an agentic forecasting environment built on 2,100+ resolved Polymarket questions, where a language model (Qwen3.5-35B-A3B) learns to gather evidence during rollout via web search, page reading, and financial time series, all filtered to avoid post‑cutoff leaks. Training with single‑epoch GRPO and a Brier‑score reward improves calibration by 30‑40% and reduces search attempts, while the trained policy outperforms four frontier models in evidence‑based forecasting, achieving lower soft‑Brier scores at roughly 5% of the inference cost. The authors release the environment, dataset, and per‑rollout records as a reusable harness for temporal forecasting agents.

By Yusuf Afifi, Artur Kiulian, Anton Polishko, Mykola Khandoga, Hamudi Naanaa, Alina Krasnobrizha
arXiv AI
Jul 15

Critic Experience Bank: Self-Evolving Step-Level Confidence Estimation for LLM Agents

arXiv:2607. 12397v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LLM agents act in external environments where each action changes the state that later decisions condition on, and where a single wrong step can waste interaction budget or trigger irreversible side effects long before the final failure is observed.

By Yaopei Zeng, Congchao Wang, JianHang Chen, Nan Wang, Yurui Chang, Lu Lin
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 31

How Proper Scoring Rules Shape LLM Forecasting

The paper investigates how different proper scoring rules influence the performance and behavior of large language model (LLM) forecasters. Five scoring rules were compared as training objectives for binary forecasts of real-world events, revealing that while they all theoretically incentivize truthful probability reporting, they produce models with varying calibration, probability usage, and bias, information, and noise profiles. The Brier-trained model achieved the lowest Brier score and highest AUC-ROC, whereas the log-trained model achieved the best log score and lowest calibration error, indicating that scoring rule choice can shape both forecast accuracy and error structure.

By Benjamin Turtel, Paul Wilczewski, Kris Skotheim, Ville A. Satop\"a\"a, Philip E. Tetlock