arXiv AI By Tao An

Verbatim Chunks Beat Extracted Artifacts: A Controlled Ablation of Memory Representations for Long LLM Conversations

Read the original on arXiv AI →

arXiv:2601. 00821v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: A growing class of conversational-memory systems compresses dialogue history into structured artifacts -- extracted facts, decisions, or events -- on the premise that distilled structure retrieves better than raw text.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
Aug 26

RENDER: Controlling Reader-Facing Evidence in LLM Memory Evaluation

RENDER is a benchmark that controls the reader‑facing artifact in memory and RAG evaluations while keeping the conversation fixed. It introduces a five‑level packet ladder and deterministic templates that mimic ChatGPT‑style entries, LangChain summaries, MemGPT‑style typed records, and raw conversation. Experiments on 500 LongMemEval questions across nine models show that matched‑budget packets outperform raw dialogue by 42.4–72.6 points, and that ChatGPT‑style entries often score higher than raw conversation, with effects persisting under retrieval noise and transferring to HotpotQA.

By Yuan Si, Simeng Han, Daming Li, Jialu Zhang
arXiv Computation and Language
Aug 31

Entity-Memory Graph Retrieval Improves Evidence Coverage in Long-Conversation Question Answering

Entity-Memory graph retrieval preserves dialogue turns as verbatim memory nodes, links repeated mentions via shared entities, and connects adjacent memories with chronological edges. During retrieval, the system gates through entities, fuses semantics, and performs one‑hop chronological recovery before dense backfill, allowing it to keep neighboring memories that dense cosine ranking might miss. On 1,986 questions from ten LoCoMo conversations, this graph retrieval method increases official evidence recall at top‑k 25 from 79.7468 % to 84.4842 %, with the advantage extending from top‑k 5 to 50, though it does not improve overall final‑answer F1.

By Shumao Sun