arXiv AI By Yitong Han, Wei Gao, Yi Zhao, Prasanta Bhattacharya, Fengzhu Zeng, Mohammad Amanlou

ValueGraph: Value-Signal Guided Graph Pre-training for Contextualized User Representation

Read the original on arXiv AI →

ValueGraph is a graph pre‑training framework that incorporates automatically inferred moral‑value signals as soft constraints to learn contextualized user representations. By constructing post‑reply graphs, it captures both semantic and structural information and aligns users through contrastive and clustering objectives based on relative value similarity. Experiments on stance detection and Twitter bot detection demonstrate consistent improvements over strong text‑based, graph‑based, and LLM baselines, underscoring the benefit of value‑signal guidance for socially informed user modeling.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jun 22

Learning Moral Diversity: Modelling Individual Perspectives in Moral Classification of Texts

Understanding moral values in social media text offers insight into moral judgement formation, and supervised NLP models trained on crowdsourced data have achieved strong classification performance. However, most approaches simplify the problem by aggregating multiple annotators' labels into a single "ground truth", overlooking the inherent subjectivity of the task.

arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 4

Less Is Moral: A CHARMing Framework for Moral Foundations Detection in Endorsement Behaviour

The paper introduces CHARM, a lightweight fine‑tuned language model framework for detecting moral foundations in text. CHARM combines MAC cross‑attention, rationale alignment, and hate‑speech modulation to operationalize distinct psychological constructs, achieving up to 15.3% higher AUC in‑domain and outperforming supervised baselines on all out‑of‑domain datasets. The authors demonstrate CHARM’s scalability by applying it to large‑scale COVID‑19 Twitter data, revealing a strong link between moral value alignment and online endorsement behavior.

By Huixiang Fu, Marian-Andrei Rizoiu
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Sep 2

C$^{3}$T: Counterfactual Causal Reasoning for Sentiment Shifts in Social-Media Conversation Trees

The paper introduces C$^{3}$T, a Counterfactual Causal Conversation Transformer that models sentiment shifts in social‑media conversation trees by treating discourse moves such as denial, evidence, and toxicity as interventions. It adds a causal sentiment reasoning layer, CaSiRe, to public rumor datasets, providing sentiment, shift, intervention, and causal‑source annotations. Experiments show that C$^{3}$T outperforms text‑only, graph‑based, and temporal baselines in predicting sentiment and attribution, revealing that denials and evidence reduce negativity while toxicity increases it.