arXiv AI
ValiAssist: Scaling LLM-generated Programming Feedback Validation by Demonstration
Read the original on arXiv AI →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv AI.
Related stories
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 22
Correct Diagnosis, Better Feedback: A Symbolic-Verifier for Faithful LLM Tutoring Feedback in Logic Proofs
arXiv:2609.22553v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Effective LLM tutoring depends on correctly identifying the specific error in a student's reasoning before generating feedback. We study this problem i...
arXiv AI
Jun 12
An Explainable AI Assistant for Introductory Programming Education: Improving Feedback Reliability with Instructor-AI Collaboration
arXiv:2606. 12425v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Active learning is widely recognized as an effective approach for improving learning outcomes in introductory programming courses.
arXiv AI
Sep 21
Self-Explanation Tutor for Active Study of CS1 Worked Examples
The paper presents ESSE, a self‑explanation tutor that uses a large language model to give immediate feedback on students’ line‑by‑line explanations of introductory programming worked examples. It evaluates the LLM’s judgments against a domain expert and a crowd of non‑experts, finding that the model is reliable enough to serve as the tutor’s assessment engine. In an introductory Java course, the tutor’s feedback encourages students to persist, improves the completeness and conceptual depth of their explanations, and shows evidence of learning.
arXiv AI
Aug 14
Assessment Design in the GenAI Era: The X1-X2-X3 Assessment Pattern for Testing Students' AI Literacy, Learning Outcomes, and Reflection
arXiv:2608. 12351v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) has challenged the validity of unsupervised online assessment, especially in technical subjects where plausible answers can be produced with little effort.
arXiv AI
Sep 25
A Risk-Adaptive and Evidence-Constrained Framework for Generative AI Feedback in Programming Education
The paper presents a risk‑adaptive, evidence‑constrained framework for providing feedback in introductory programming courses. Using data from 2,993 failed submissions by 215 students, the authors built models that predict persistent failure and generate four tailored feedback conditions for 136 cases. The framework employs calibrated risk to decide when to intervene, evidence gating to limit feedback content, and a progressive assistance strategy that moves from self‑checks to localized hints.
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Sep 24
A Risk-Adaptive and Evidence-Constrained Framework for Generative AI Feedback in Programming Education
The paper presents a risk‑adaptive, evidence‑constrained framework that uses learning analytics to provide personalized feedback in introductory programming. By training models on 2,993 failed‑submission states from 215 students, the authors predict persistent failure and generate four tailored feedback conditions for 136 cases. A calibrated risk policy selects interventions for 17.8% of eligible states, capturing 25.2% of persistent failures, and the framework ensures that generated messages contain all required components after evidence gating.