arXiv:2604. 19191v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Deploying AI-based anomaly detection across diverse clinical imaging settings remains challenging because most existing methods rely on modality-specific architectures, anatomical priors, or extensive retraining, limiting their use as general-purpose screening tools.
By Pritam Kar, Gouri Lakshmi S, Saptarshi Bej
arXiv:2605. 24609v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Artificial intelligence is increasingly integrated into radiotherapy workflows, yet such pipelines remain vulnerable to out-of-distribution image data that may introduce unexpected behavior in clinical tasks.
By Mustafa Kadhim, Viktor Rogowski, Emilia Persson, Camila Gonzalez, Andr\'e Haraldsson, Sofie Ceberg, Mikael Nilsson, Malin K\"ugele, Sven B\"ack, Christian Jamtheim Gustafsson
arXiv:2507. 21164v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Unsupervised anomaly detection (UAD) aims to detect anomalies without labeled data, a necessity in many machine learning applications where anomalous samples are rare or not available.
By Nicolas Pinon (MYRIAD), Robin Trombetta (MYRIAD), Carole Lartizien (MYRIAD)
Unified visual anomaly detection seeks to train a single detector that can be deployed across categories, domains, and application scenarios. In the few-shot transfer regime, the key challenge is to estimate an episode-specific boundary for an unseen target category from a small support set.
arXiv:2609.24265v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Unsupervised anomaly detection (UAD) aims to localize abnormal regions in medical scans without pixel-level annotations. A typical strategy seeks to...
By Hugues Roy, Reuben Dorent, Ninon Burgos
MIRTO is an evaluation protocol for unsupervised anomaly segmentation in brain MRI that explicitly documents key methodological choices—such as registration alignment, threshold setting, and false‑positive budgeting—and measures their impact. It applies a registration check, uses validation data for thresholding, reports realized false‑positive volumes, and repeats each comparison across 15,552 evaluation pipelines with bootstrap intervals. In a study on four UAD methods and 312 BraTS 2020 subjects, MIRTO revealed that an axis‑order mismatch dramatically lowered a diffusion model’s voxel AUROC, and that many performance differences were driven by lesion definition and threshold transfer rather than model quality.
By Negin Kafee Hernashki, Soumick Chatterjee