arXiv Computation and Language By Patrick Gerard, Julia Mendelsohn, Kristina Lerman

Unifying Models of Intergroup Hostility in Online Discourse

Read the original on arXiv Computation and Language →

The paper examines how six foundational theories of intergroup hostility—boundary construction, threat construction, scapegoating, negative evaluation, dehumanization, and action orientation—manifest in online discourse. Using 2.86 million posts from TikTok, Truth Social, and Twitter/X during the 2024 U.S. presidential election, the authors model these mechanisms within a common empirical framework and find that boundary and threat construction anchor the system, with a regular temporal ordering of rhetorical strategies. The study maps theoretical frameworks onto real-world discourse, offering a clearer empirical basis for computational social science to model intergroup hostility beyond single-label detection.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Computation and Language.

arXiv Computation and Language
2d ago

High prevalence of antagonizing rhetoric in trending topics on Twitter/X

The study introduces a computational method to distinguish between antagonizing and criticizing rhetoric in political discourse on Twitter/X. Analyzing over 17 million tweets from German trending topics, it finds that roughly one‑third contain antagonizing rhetoric, which is more prevalent in trending discussions than in general Twitter traffic. Right‑leaning users use antagonizing language more than left‑leaning users, and both forms of rhetoric are amplified within political camps, with certain parties—AfD and the Greens—emerging as primary antagonists.

By Armin Pournaki, Eckehard Olbrich
arXiv AI
2d ago

Political Narratives in the 2024 Moldovan Presidential Election: Stance, Amplification, and Influence

The study examines how political narratives formed and spread on X, Facebook, and Reddit during the 2024 Moldovan presidential election. Using multilingual stance detection, network analysis, and causal inference, it finds distinct cross‑platform differences in positions on European integration, Russia, and the candidates, and shows that amplification and peer exposure significantly reinforce these narratives. This is the first comprehensive analysis of social media discourse for this election, highlighting the role of language, network dynamics, and causal effects in shaping political influence.

By Andrea Piras, Osman Rahmoun, Elena Zheleva