arXiv Machine Learning By Alireza Modirshanechi, Benjamin Eysenbach, Peter Dayan, Eric Schulz

Unifying Goal-Conditioned RL and Unsupervised Skill Learning via Control-Maximization

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

The paper unifies goal‑conditioned reinforcement learning (GCRL) and mutual information skill learning (MISL) under a control‑maximization framework. It shows that three canonical GCRL formulations are fundamentally inequivalent, yet all can be interpreted as maximizing goal sensitivity of future trajectories. By relating MISL objectives to these GCRL formulations, the authors prove that each MISL objective is bounded by a formulation‑specific downstream goal sensitivity, establishing a precise correspondence between skill diversity and goal‑reachability.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

arXiv Machine Learning
Oct 8

An Informational Curse of Horizon in Goal-Conditioned Policy Learning

The paper identifies an informational curse of horizon in goal-conditioned policy learning, showing that longer goal relabeling horizons during training can hurt policy generalization and performance. Controlled experiments with oracle planners separate training horizons from test horizons, revealing that behavioral cloning policies degrade with longer horizons while reinforcement learning mitigates this effect. The authors attribute this to reduced conditional mutual information between actions and hindsight-relabeled goals, and demonstrate that distilling short-horizon policy Jacobians into long-horizon policies improves performance, especially in combinatorial manipulation tasks.

By John L. Zhou, Yuxuan Dong, Jonathan C. Kao