arXiv Machine Learning By Egor Shulgin

Understanding Practical Optimization in Machine Learning

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

The thesis investigates practical optimization techniques used in modern machine learning, such as submodel training, gradient clipping, and layer-wise non‑Euclidean directions, by analyzing their actual objectives, assumptions, updates, and computations rather than simplified proxies. It demonstrates that Independent Subnetwork Training can converge to a shifted fixed point due to sketching bias, while Model‑Agnostic Sparsified Training incorporates the sketch distribution to achieve unbiased gradients and convergence guarantees. The work also explores private optimization, showing that adaptive quantile clipping retains bias unless a suitable schedule is used, and combines smoothed normalization with error compensation to obtain distributed private convergence without bounded gradient assumptions. Additionally, it develops a layer‑wise generalized smoothness model for optimizers based on linear minimization oracles, validates it through the Gluon framework, and highlights the importance of precise orthogonalization in Muon‑style methods.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

arXiv AI
Oct 12

From SGD to Muon: Adaptive Optimization via Schatten-p Norms

The paper introduces a data‑driven criterion that dynamically selects optimal Linear Minimization Oracle (LMO) geometries for each layer of a deep neural network, bridging the gap between SGD and Muon updates. By deriving the criterion from gradient and activation statistics via a single‑step random feature regression surrogate, the authors enable a design space that interpolates between existing optimizers, including SGD, Muon, Adam, and MuAdam. The adaptive approach incurs only about a 3% runtime overhead and demonstrates competitive or superior performance compared to the best static optimizer across three training scenarios.

By Thomas Massena (DTIPG - SNCF, IRIT), Corentin Friedrich (IRIT), Mathieu Serrurier (IRIT)