Understanding and Mitigating Token-Pruning-Induced Vulnerabilities in VLMs
Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Machine Learning.
The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Machine Learning.
arXiv:2607. 22716v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: In this paper, we show for the first time that visual token pruning enhances the robustness of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs), mitigating vulnerabilities such as jailbreak attacks and hallucinations.
Guardrail models, which screen malicious prompts in LLM services, often use lightweight Transformers with short context windows and bucketed positional encodings. The study identifies a new failure mode called Overflip, where repeating a prompt causes the guardrail’s prediction to flip from malicious to benign as the sequence length increases. Experiments on nine popular guardrails show that 5 models exhibit MAL→BEN flips on 100 prompts, with flip rates ranging from 8% to 92% and first flips occurring between 2.6k and 9.4k tokens, highlighting a gradual attention dispersion distinct from traditional attention‑dilution attacks.
arXiv:2610.09941v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large vision-language models (LVLMs) are increasingly deployed in safety-critical applications, yet they remain vulnerable to backdoor attacks. Defendi...
arXiv:2607. 19894v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are vulnerable to backdoor attacks, where hidden triggers induce malicious outputs.
Large language models (LLMs) are vulnerable to backdoor attacks, where hidden triggers induce malicious outputs. Existing defenses generally fall into inference-time detection or training-time mitigation, but face two key limitations.
arXiv:2609.38298v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Vision Language Models (VLMs) are widely deployed in safety-critical scenarios, and understanding to which extent they can be controlled by adversarial...