arXiv AI By Zirui Ding (Institute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences), Xinxin Fan (University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, State Key Laboratory of AI Safety, Institute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences), Hao Yuan (Institute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, ShanghaiTech University), Shaoye Luo (University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, State Key Laboratory of AI Safety, Institute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences), Men Niu (Institute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences), Yunfeng Lu (Beihang University)

Uncovering Why LLMs Fail: From Internal Mechanisms to Adversarial Reasoning Trajectories

Read the original on arXiv AI →

The paper introduces CauTrace, a white‑box diagnostic framework that analyzes why large language models (LLMs) fail by examining internal states, representation propagation, and temporal coordination during reasoning. It defines seven functional states to capture support and constraint processing, tracks how these states evolve across Transformer blocks, and studies the timing of commitment and verification steps. Experiments on Qwen and LLaMA-family models show distinct failure signatures, and repair/steering tests confirm that the framework’s signals align with expected changes in the inference process.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.