Hugging Face Trending Papers
Unanimously Wrong: Certified Abstention from How Medical LLM Consensus Forms
Read the original on Hugging Face Trending Papers →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at Hugging Face Trending Papers.
Related stories
arXiv AI
1d ago
Unanimously Wrong: Certified Abstention from How Medical LLM Consensus Forms
arXiv:2610.07570v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: In clinical practice, agreement among independent experts is treated as evidence of reliability, and multi-round consensus has become a core mechanism...
arXiv AI
Jun 8
Multi-Agent Reasoning with Consistency Verification Improves Uncertainty Calibration in Medical MCQA
arXiv:2603. 24481v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Miscalibrated confidence scores are a practical obstacle to deploying AI in clinical settings.
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 27
SURE-RAG: Sufficiency and Uncertainty-Aware Evidence Verification for Selective Retrieval-Augmented Generation
arXiv:2605. 03534v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) grounds answers in retrieved passages, yet relevance does not guarantee sufficiency: a topical passage may still fail to justify the answer.
arXiv AI
Sep 10
A Layered Analysis of Disagreement And Answer Quality in Multi-Agent LLM Debate
arXiv:2609.08016v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multi-agent debate, in which several LLMs exchange arguments before answering, is widely assumed to improve answer quality by surfacing genuine disagre...
arXiv AI
Aug 26
Right Diagnoses, Decorative Reasoning:A Perturbation Audit of Medical Chain-of-Thought
The study evaluates whether the chain-of-thought (CoT) rationales produced by medical language models truly influence their answers. Using a 30‑operator perturbation audit that modifies both the question and the CoT (e.g., severity reversal, negation flip, demographic swap, evidence ablation), the authors found that 72.9% of edits did not change the model’s answer—a high Chain‑Decoupling Rate (CDR). Across 14 large language models and four medical QA benchmarks, the CoT text had little impact on accuracy, and removing CoT prompting did not reduce performance. "whyItMatters":"The findings suggest that current medical CoT outputs may be more documentation than genuine reasoning, highlighting the need for better faithfulness checks in clinical AI systems."
arXiv AI
Aug 3
Reasoning in Real World Clinical Care: Why Large Language Models Are Not Yet Safe for Autonomous Clinical Decision Support
arXiv:2607. 28677v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LLM now pass medical licensing examinations and, in curated cases, can rival physicians at diagnostic reasoning.