arXiv Machine Learning
Type-II Error Bounds for Test Supermartingales from Lower-Tail Hypotheses
Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Machine Learning.
Related stories
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 24
The Type-II Error of Test Supermartingales: e-Power versus the Chernoff-Stein Exponent
arXiv:2609. 27765v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: In safe hypothesis testing with test supermartingales, Ville's inequality provides anytime-valid type-I error guarantees for every significance level $\alpha\in(0,1]$, if one rejects the null hypothesis whenever the wealth process first exceeds $1/\alpha$.
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 4
Tail-Aware Information-Theoretic Bounds for LLM Alignment under Heavy-Tailed Rewards
arXiv:2604. 10727v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Classical information-theoretic learning bounds typically rely on KL mutual information and moment-generating-function (MGF) arguments, which are well matched to bounded or sub-Gaussian losses but can be ineffective when losses or rewards are heavy-tailed.
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 18
On Stopping Times of Power-one Sequential Tests: Tight Lower and Upper Bounds
arXiv:2504. 19952v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We present two general lower bounds for stopping times of sequential tests between arbitrary composite nulls $\mathcal P$ and alternatives $\mathcal Q$.
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 3
Parameter-Free Heavy-Tailed Bandits
arXiv:2607. 29460v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Heavy-tailed distributions arise naturally in sequential decision-making problems such as financial investment, online advertising, and network management, where rare but extreme outcomes can dominate performance.
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 11
Bilateral Trade Under Heavy-Tailed Valuations: Minimax Regret without a Variance Bound
The paper studies contextual bilateral trade with full feedback, showing that action-independent observations eliminate the usual polynomial adaptation penalty seen in heavy-tailed bandits. It presents fully parameter-free algorithms that achieve oracle minimax regret rates without knowing the moment order or scale, and derives new regret bounds for both parametric and nonparametric settings. The key technical insight is a paired squared‑loss statistic whose noise cancels, enabling model selection and yielding regret rates that interpolate between classical nonparametric and linear extremes.
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 9
Asymptotic Optimality of Thompson Sampling for Risk-Averse Bandits with Sub-Gaussian Rewards
arXiv:2606. 09191v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We prove that $\rho\text{-}\mathrm{NPTS}_{\mathrm{SG}}$, an anchor-free nonparametric Thompson Sampling algorithm for risk-averse bandits, achieves regret matching the instance-dependent lower bound to leading order in $\log n$, establishing it as asymptotically optimal for any continuous risk functional $\rho$ (CVaR, mean-variance, Sharpe ratio, distortion risk measures, and more) on the class of distributions with bounded density and sub-Gaussian tails, including Gaussian arms.