TTE-Flash: Accelerating Reasoning-based Multimodal Representations via Think-Then-Embed Tokens
Read the original on arXiv AI →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv AI.
The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv AI.
arXiv:2606.13061v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Reasoning-driven universal multimodal embedding has advanced rapidly by introducing Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning into the embedding pipeline. D...
arXiv:2604.22280v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have emerged as a promising foundation for universal multimodal embeddings. Recent studies have shown that...
MMEmb-R1 is a multimodal embedding framework that enhances reasoning by treating it as a latent variable and selecting beneficial reasoning paths through pair-aware selection and counterfactual intervention. It uses reinforcement learning to invoke reasoning only when necessary, reducing unnecessary computation and latency. On the MMEB-V2 benchmark, MMEmb-R1 achieves a state‑of‑the‑art score of 71.2 with just 4 B parameters.
arXiv:2609.15296v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Universal multimodal embedding (UME) learns unified representations across modalities, enabling a single model to support diverse retrieval tasks. Rece...
The paper introduces LARK, a two‑stage latent reasoning framework designed to mitigate cross‑modal dilution in multimodal recommendation systems. In the first stage, learnable latent tokens are interleaved with chain‑of‑thought reasoning and aligned with a frozen vision encoder to preserve visual details. The second stage projects these latent representations through a bridge MLP, employing item‑to‑item contrastive learning and aligning intermediate features with the first‑stage hidden states to anchor final embeddings to the model’s reasoning output. Experiments on three public benchmarks and an industrial dataset demonstrate that LARK achieves state‑of‑the‑art performance across multiple recommendation architectures, with ablation studies confirming the contribution of each component.
The paper investigates whether reasoning always benefits universal multimodal embeddings (UMEs). By comparing the discriminative and reasoning-driven branches of UME-R1, the authors find that while reasoning improves positive similarity in 56.6% of cases, it also creates 15.7% false-helpful instances where hard negatives are drawn closer. Diagnostic analyses reveal that reasoning often de‑condenses retrieved neighborhoods and that chain‑of‑thought tokens encode evidence common to both positives and hard negatives. Based on these insights, the authors introduce SURE, a utility router that boosts UME-R1‑7B by 1.5 points and consistently improves other embedding models on MMEB‑V2 without retraining or extra VLM passes.