Trust Hinders Bidirectional Human-AI Alignment
Read the original on arXiv AI →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv AI.
The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv AI.
The paper proposes a mental model-based framework of trust that captures multidimensional aspects of trust and can be used to infer human trust in AI agents. It formalizes trust perception, trust evolution, human reliance, and decision-making, and defines the appropriate level of trust in the agent. Human subject studies evaluate whether adjusting human beliefs about the agent, as predicted by the framework, can change trust perceptions across performance, process, and purpose dimensions.
arXiv:2608. 12372v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: AI systems are increasingly employed as decision aids, decision delegates, or autonomous decision-makers.
The paper surveys 61 studies on mental‑health AI and identifies a misalignment in how trust is evaluated across disciplines. It proposes a three‑layer framework—human‑oriented, interaction‑oriented, and AI‑oriented trust—and maps stakeholder perspectives onto these layers. The authors argue that future research should focus on calibrating human trust to actual interaction and AI trustworthiness rather than merely maximizing perceived trust.
arXiv:2606. 12587v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Traditionally, decision support studies how humans use machine learning models to make better decisions.
arXiv:2504.07170v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Trustworthy AI encompasses many aspirational aspects for aligning AI systems with human values, including fairness, privacy, robustness, explainabi...
arXiv:2607. 03025v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The use of Large Language Models (LLMs) across diverse areas of human activity-ranging from everyday tasks to safety-critical applications-aims to enhance decision-making effectiveness with minimal human feedback.