arXiv Machine Learning By Manuel Wendl, Lukas Koller, Tobias Ladner, Matthias Althoff

Training Verifiably Robust Agents Using Set-Based Reinforcement Learning

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

arXiv:2408. 09112v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Reinforcement learning policies parametrized by deep neural networks have achieved strong performance for continuous control, yet even small input perturbations may lead to unpredictable behavior.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 14

Robust Policy Optimization via Adversarial Importance Sampling

The paper introduces Adversarial Importance Sampling (Advis), a technique that leverages importance sampling over standard training trajectories to estimate and optimize worst‑case returns without extra environment interactions or auxiliary networks, thereby capturing long‑term robustness. It also presents advrl, a modular PyTorch library that consolidates existing robustness methods and adversarial attacks into single‑file implementations for easier prototyping and reproducible evaluation. Finally, the authors highlight that optimal adversarial hyperparameters do not transfer across agents, prompting evaluation against a broader set of attackers (6–14× more configurations) and demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach on continuous control tasks.

By Amine Andam, Jamal Bentahar, Mustapha Hedabou
arXiv AI
Jun 10

Robust Deep Reinforcement Learning Through Adversarial Attacks and Training : A Survey

arXiv:2403. 00420v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) is a subfield of machine learning for training autonomous agents that take sequential actions across complex environments.

By Lucas Schott, Josephine Delas, Hatem Hajri, Elies Gherbi, Reda Yaich, Nora Boulahia-Cuppens, Frederic Cuppens, Sylvain Lamprier
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 14

A Unified and Constrained View of Regularization-Based Robust Reinforcement Learning

The paper presents a unified framework for regularization-based robust reinforcement learning by deriving upper bounds on the performance gap between nominal and worst-case policies. These bounds are expressed as a regularization objective plus a KL-divergence penalty, explaining why KL penalties enhance robustness. The authors reformulate robust training as a constrained optimization problem, updating the Lagrange multiplier jointly with the policy to automatically tune regularization, and validate the approach with extensive adversarial evaluations on continuous control tasks.

By Amine Andam, Jamal Bentahar, Mustapha Hedabou