arXiv:2606. 18430v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Statistical watermarks help organizations attribute large language model (LLM) outputs, yet existing detectors often struggle when watermark signals are weak, texts are repetitive, or watermarks are edited.
By Chih-Duo Hong, Yen-Pang Chen, Fang Yu
arXiv:2603. 23171v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Providers monitor deployed large language models (LLMs) to detect misuse that they cannot prevent.
By Toluwani Aremu, Daniil Ognev, Samuele Poppi, Nils Lukas
arXiv:2607. 20435v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Open-source LLMs (OSMs)arereaching near state-of-the-art performance, prompting prior works to trace the text they generate by embedding text watermarking algorithms directly into their weights.
By Luisa Scharff, Thibaud Gloaguen, Robin Staab, Martin Vechev
Provenance watermarking is increasingly treated as a safeguard for synthetic speech, whether built directly into speech-generation models such as Chatterbox, provided through dedicated techniques such as AudioSeal, or deployed by commercial platforms such as ElevenLabs. We identify a previously uncharacterized liability: when synthetic speech is watermarked and human speech is not, detectors trained alongside latch onto the watermark as a spurious "watermark => fake" shortcut.
arXiv:2606. 23335v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Provenance watermarking is increasingly treated as a safeguard for synthetic speech, whether built directly into speech-generation models such as Chatterbox, provided through dedicated techniques such as AudioSeal, or deployed by commercial platforms such as ElevenLabs.
By Nicolas M. M\"uller, Pascal Debus
arXiv:2504. 00035v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) enable powerful knowledge injection through approaches such as in-context learning and fine-tuning, but they also introduce new risks of unauthorized imitation of high-value creative works.
By Ziwei Zhang, Juan Wen, Wanli Peng, Zhengxian Wu, Yinghan Zhou, Yiming Xue