arXiv Computation and Language By Mojdeh Rahmanian, Foutse Khomh, Ashkan Sami, Yanchao Yu

Tracing Hallucinations in LLM Reasoning for UML Class Diagram Generation: An Empirical Taxonomy and Mitigation Study

Read the original on arXiv Computation and Language →

The paper presents an empirical taxonomy of eleven hallucination sub‑types in large language models (LLMs) that generate UML class diagrams from natural language requirements, organized into Prompt Faithfulness, Code Faithfulness, and Reasoning Quality. The taxonomy was derived from 60 manually annotated DeepSeek‑R1 traces and applied to additional traces, revealing model‑dependent failure patterns and a negative association between requirement complexity and Prompt Faithfulness errors. A mitigation experiment with Qwen3‑based models showed that adding Prompt Faithfulness and Reasoning Quality constraints to the prompt improved the F1 score by 4.0 percentage points, while post‑hoc Code Faithfulness review offered no consistent benefit.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Computation and Language.

arXiv Computation and Language
Oct 21

Fluent but Fallible: Benchmarking Hallucination and Factual Reliability in Large Language Models

The paper "Fluent but Fallible: Benchmarking Hallucination and Factual Reliability in Large Language Models" evaluates ten advanced LLMs on a benchmark of 70 academic prompts across four complexity levels. Using five metrics—Accuracy, Precision, Recall, Response Deviation Index, and Hallucination Index—reviewers found that Perplexity and DeepSeek V3 achieved the highest overall accuracy, Gemini balanced recall and performance, LLaMA 3 resisted hallucinations, and Falcon had perfect precision but low recall and high deviation. The study highlights a trade‑off between response completeness and factual reliability, especially as prompt complexity increases.

By Osama Shabih, Dayam Nadeem, Shahab Saquib Sohail, Mohammad Nadeem
arXiv AI
Aug 11

Reproducing and Stress-Testing Two Approaches to LLM Reasoning Reliability: Test-Time Probability Aggregation and Logic-Representation Editing

arXiv:2608. 08514v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We independently reproduce two recent methods for making large language model (LLM) reasoning more reliable, and stress-test them across domains and models (RPC across four new task domains with Qwen3-8B, LCF across four 7-8B models).

By Minhan Cho, Jimin Kweon