arXiv Computation and Language By Zhenlong Dai, Xujie Song, Zitong Wang, Tong Niu, Jian liu, Weiqiang Wang, Xiu Tang, Sai Wu, Chang Yao, Jingyuan Chen

ToolSearcher: Optimizing Tool Selection at Scale via Reinforcement Learning

Read the original on arXiv Computation and Language →

ToolSearcher is a reinforcement learning framework designed to improve large‑scale tool selection for large language models. It introduces category‑constrained discrimination, event‑level search modeling, and trajectory‑aligned credit allocation to better distinguish similar tools, optimize multi‑turn search, and provide fine‑grained rewards. Experiments on large‑scale benchmarks show that ToolSearcher outperforms strong baselines in iterative search and complex tool composition scenarios.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Computation and Language.

arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 16

Spurious Tool Use: When RL Agents Learn the Wrong Reason to Act

The paper investigates how reinforcement learning can cause large language model agents to adopt shortcut policies for tool use, relying on superficial prompt cues rather than actual task needs. By creating synthetic environments that mix factual QA and math reasoning, the authors show that agents often invoke tools when cues are present, even when those tools are unnecessary, with spurious invocation rates rising up to 39%. They find that shortcut learning occurs mainly when agents have already mastered the target tool and that semantic alignment between cues and tools amplifies the effect. To counter this, they propose a dense, decision-level reward where an LLM judge assesses tool necessity, which reduces cue-driven tool use while maintaining performance.

By Yiwei Yang, Haoxiang Zhang, Bingbing Wen, Yao Lu, Yuchen Wu, Lei Zhang, Julian McAuley, Pan Lu, Bill Howe
arXiv AI
Sep 2

CoBRA: Learning Tool-Use Boundaries via Counterfactual Margins

CoBRA is a counterfactual boundary‑learning framework designed to improve when a tool‑augmented language model should call an external tool. It builds internal and external experts from the same base model, collects paired trajectories, and estimates the reward margin between answering with and without tools. Using these margins, CoBRA partitions data into internal‑favored, external‑favored, and ambiguous cases, then applies Boundary‑Aware Cold‑Start SFT and MARS‑RL to optimize boundary decisions, leading to more efficient tool use and better accuracy on tool‑dependent out‑of‑distribution questions.

By Wenhao Zou, Xianglong Liu, Wendong Bi, Hanjie Wang, Simin Zhao, Gong Zhi
arXiv AI
Sep 3

UniToolCall: Unifying Tool-Use Representation, Data, and Evaluation for LLM Agents

UniToolCall introduces a unified framework for tool-use in large language model agents, standardizing toolset construction, dataset generation, and evaluation. The framework aggregates over 22,000 tools and creates a hybrid training corpus of more than 390,000 instances by combining ten public datasets with synthetically generated, structurally controlled trajectories. It models diverse interaction patterns—single‑hop vs. multi‑hop, single‑turn vs. multi‑turn, serial vs. parallel execution—and adds an Anchor Linkage mechanism to enforce cross‑turn dependencies, while converting seven public benchmarks into a common Query–Action–Observation–Answer format for fine‑grained evaluation.

By Yijuan Liang, Xinghao Chen, Yifan Ge, Ziyi Wu, Hao Wu, Changyu Zeng, Wei Xing, Xiaoyu Shen