arXiv Computation and Language
Tool Verification for Test-Time Reinforcement Learning
Read the original on arXiv Computation and Language →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Computation and Language.
Related stories
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 3
SVR: Self-Verifying Refinement via Joint Verdict-Confidence Reinforcement Learning for Adaptive Test-Time Compute
arXiv:2607. 28457v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Scaling test-time computation can improve language-model reasoning, but uniform budgets waste computation on easy inputs, while verifier-guided refinement relies on external feedback.
arXiv AI
Aug 18
Delay, Plateau, or Collapse: Evaluating the Impact of Systematic Verification Error on RLVR
arXiv:2605. 02909v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) has become a powerful approach for improving the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs).
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 9
RLVE: Scaling Up Reinforcement Learning for Language Models with Adaptive Verifiable Environments
arXiv:2511. 07317v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We introduce Reinforcement Learning (RL) with Adaptive Verifiable Environments (RLVE), an approach using verifiable environments that procedurally generate problems and provide algorithmically verifiable rewards, to scale up RL for language models (LMs).
arXiv AI
Jul 14
SVR-R1: Bootstrapping Multi-modal Reasoning with Self-verification in Reinforcement Learning
arXiv:2607. 10966v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We introduce Self-Verified Reasoner (SVR-R1), a multi-turn RL framework that turns a model's own verification into a learning signal for multimodal reasoning.
arXiv AI
Jul 7
LLM-as-a-Tutor: Policy-Aware Prompt Adaptation for Non-Verifiable RL
arXiv:2607. 04412v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reinforcement learning (RL) for non-verifiable instruction following increasingly relies on LLM judges with prompt-specific rubrics as reward signals.
arXiv AI
3d ago
Learning from the Test: Self-Referential Differential Testing for Deep RL Agents
The paper introduces Delta, a two‑phase framework for testing deep reinforcement learning agents. In the first phase, the agent under test is evaluated for catastrophic failures while collecting decision‑making data. The second phase trains a challenger agent from this data using offline RL; comparing the challenger’s rewards to the original agent reveals optimality bugs, and Delta successfully uncovered thousands of such issues across multiple environments.