arXiv:2602. 08868v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Time-series anomaly detection (TSAD) with multimodal large language models (MLLMs) is an emerging area, yet a persistent challenge remains: MLLMs rely on coarse time-series heuristics but struggle with multi-dimensional, detailed reasoning, which is vital for understanding complex time-series data.
By Junru Zhang, Lang Feng, Haoran Shi, Xu Guo, Han Yu, Yabo Dong, Duanqing Xu
arXiv:2609.38789v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Reconstruction errors in multivariate time-series anomaly detection may not reliably distinguish abnormal behavior from benign deviations. Language-der...
By Jahyeob Koo, Kio Yun, Byoungmo Koo, Jun-Geol Baek
arXiv:2606. 08601v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have recently demonstrated impressive potential for time series forecasting.
By Peiliang Gong, Emadeldeen Eldele, Chenyu Liu, Ziyu Jia, Yi Ding, Xinliang Zhou, Lianchao Gu, Qi Zhu, Yang Liu, Daoqiang Zhang, Xiaoli Li
arXiv:2603. 26842v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Time series anomaly detection (TSAD) is essential for maintaining the reliability and security of IoT-enabled service systems.
By PengYu Chen, Shang Wan, Xiaohou Shi, Yuan Chang, Yan Sun, Sajal K. Das
The paper introduces TimeCatch, a benchmark that evaluates temporal consistency in vision‑language models (VLMs) by treating temporal grounding as an anomaly detection problem. Temporal anomalies are created by swapping consecutive frames, while frame‑level anomalies involve replacing a frame with Gaussian noise. Across synthetic and real‑world datasets, VLMs reliably detect and localize frame‑level anomalies but perform near chance on temporal anomaly detection, whereas humans excel at both tasks.
By Marek Hradil, Danae S\'anchez Villegas
Vision-language models (VLMs) achieve strong performance on video and image-sequence benchmarks, yet it remains unclear whether they capture temporal structure. To study this question, we formulate te...