GlanceWAM introduces a sparse test‑time imagination approach for world‑action models that decouples visual imagination from control. By asynchronously generating a single lookahead frame on a slow clock and decoding action chunks at a 48 ms control rate purely in latent space, it avoids latency while maintaining high success. The method achieves 72.2 % on the RoboCasa kitchen benchmark and 99.0 % on LIBERO, running 24× faster than synchronous baselines.
By Linhan Wang, Zijian An, Mingyuan Zhang, Chen Dai, Yi Xu, Can Cui, Zichong Yang, Yinlin Chen, Lifeng Zhou, Chang-Tien Lu
arXiv:2610.00604v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Vision-language-action policies often see only one or a few recent frames, which makes it difficult to evaluate how they use information that disappe...
By Egor Cherepanov, Nikita Kachaev, Aleksandr I. Panov, Alexey K. Kovalev
arXiv:2609.34792v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Long-horizon manipulation requires robots to remember cues that are no longer in view while responding to moving objects. Yet vision-language-actio...
By Zijian Ye, Chengqi Wei, Wei Huang, Anlin Zheng, Chunyu Zou, Liangyu Wu, Zikang Zhao, Zhenjie Peng, Yushuo Yang, Shuman Zhao, Zhongrui Wang, Xiaojuan Qi
arXiv:2609.09528v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Video large language models (Video-LLMs) are increasingly used as the perceptual front end of world models, a role that assumes they can read motion: h...
By Dhairya Bhatia, Bishoy Galoaa, Oliver Fritsche, Shahid Kamal, Muhammad Obaidullah Abdul Salam, Umer Saleem, Om Rastogi, Frania Felix Chettiar, Nesli Erdogmus, Sarah Ostadabbas
arXiv:2606. 24470v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: A real-time agent for general computer use - with games as the most demanding case - must act within tens of milliseconds while still planning over seconds.
By Bojie Li, Noah Shi
DrivingBench is the first benchmark that tests general‑purpose vision‑language models on the task of driving a real Toyota Corolla around a parking‑lot cone course. The models receive live camera frames and issue steering and velocity commands, with inference latency counted as part of the challenge. In tests, only GPT‑6 Astra completed the course, while other models showed limited progress or failed to pass half the course.
By Aditya Ramabadran, Simon Mahns, Tobias Gessler