arXiv AI By Yohei Nakajima

The Shared Discovery Paradox: How a One-Answer Rule Turns Better Information into Worse Search

Read the original on arXiv AI →

arXiv:2607. 18045v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Organizations often pool dispersed information into one ranking and then allow many agents to act on that shared view.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
Sep 3

When Does Information Sharing Improve Decentralized Discovery? Aggregation, Independent Rescue, and Equilibrium Selection

The paper investigates when information sharing enhances decentralized discovery by separating its effects on pooled estimation and independent rescue actions in finite discovery models. It shows that a registered incremental-sharing protocol improves discovery only when pooled residual error decreases faster than an independent rescue attempt, and that equilibrium selection can determine whether sharing is beneficial. The study uses synthetic, finite models without human or organizational data.

By Yohei Nakajima
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 5

Multi-Agent Lipschitz Bandits

arXiv:2602. 16965v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: We study the decentralized multi-player stochastic bandit problem over a continuous, Lipschitz-structured action space where hard collisions yield zero reward.

By Sourav Chakraborty, Amit Kiran Rege, Claire Monteleoni, Lijun Chen