Organizations often pool dispersed information into one ranking and then allow many agents to act on that shared view. In a discovery problem, this can improve beliefs while reducing coverage.
The paper investigates when information sharing enhances decentralized discovery by separating its effects on pooled estimation and independent rescue actions in finite discovery models. It shows that a registered incremental-sharing protocol improves discovery only when pooled residual error decreases faster than an independent rescue attempt, and that equilibrium selection can determine whether sharing is beneficial. The study uses synthetic, finite models without human or organizational data.
By Yohei Nakajima
arXiv:2608. 10529v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The multi-armed bandit problem is a central framework in sequential decision-making, extensively studied under sub-Gaussian reward assumptions.
By Daphne Feng, Ricardo Parada, Lily Jiang, Sophia Yi, William Chang
arXiv:2609.22757v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: A (coarse) correlated equilibrium (CE) is information-value-free (IVF) if a player can match the payoff obtained from recommendations by committing t...
By Ioannis Anagnostides, Weiqiang Zheng
arXiv:2609.06816v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Decision-time search in perfect and imperfect information games with enumerable belief states are effective methods for game AI. Collectible card games...
By Dustin Rubin
arXiv:2602. 16965v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: We study the decentralized multi-player stochastic bandit problem over a continuous, Lipschitz-structured action space where hard collisions yield zero reward.
By Sourav Chakraborty, Amit Kiran Rege, Claire Monteleoni, Lijun Chen