Post‑training quantization compresses large language models by storing weights at reduced precision, introducing errors into hidden states that could accumulate with depth. However, pretrained models accumulate far less hidden‑state error than randomly initialized ones, largely preserving downstream performance. The study identifies two key mechanisms: (1) each layer’s new error tends to oppose inherited error, partially canceling it, and (2) the LM‑head geometry preserves high‑rank token scores, mitigating output changes.
By Yuxiang Chen, Michael Beyer, Jun Zhu, Jianfei Chen
Post-training quantization reduces the deployment cost of large language models, yet how severely a quantized model degrades is not determined by bit-width alone. We systematically study weight-only post-training quantization across bit-widths, quantization methods, model scales and downstream tasks on multiple model families.
arXiv:2608. 08188v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Post-training quantization reduces the deployment cost of large language models, yet how severely a quantized model degrades is not determined by bit-width alone.
By Chenxi Zhou, Pengfei Cao, Jinyu Ye, Bohan Yu, Haida Yu, Jiang Li, Jun Zhao, Kang Liu
arXiv:2607. 08734v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Post-training quantization is widely used to deploy large language models in resource-constrained settings, yet its evaluation relies almost exclusively on accuracy and perplexity.
By Baha Rababah, Cuneyt Gurcan Akcora, Carson K. Leung
arXiv:2606. 02288v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Massive activation spikes in Large Language Models (LLMs) severely degrade quantization by stretching dynamic ranges.
By Yung-Chin Chen, Chung Peng Lee, Ze-Wei Liou, Naveen Verma
arXiv:2606. 00206v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Post-training quantization (PTQ) is widely used to deploy large language models efficiently, but its effect on reasoning models is not well understood.
By Sanae Lotfi, Polina Kirichenko, Steven Li, Zechun Liu