arXiv AI By Xueqi Li, Jingjie Ning, Yibo Kong

The Default Trap: Rethinking Plan Evaluation in Tool-Using LLM Agents

Read the original on arXiv AI →

The paper investigates how large language model agents that use tools respond to changes in plan priorities versus default plan removal, a phenomenon termed the "default trap." Experiments across 3,200 decision windows on Retail, Airline, and AgentDojo tasks show that switching priorities strongly redirects model choices, while removing a default plan yields weaker responsiveness. Additional studies reveal that the order of account lists and the presence of extra text significantly influence default target selection and priority effects, with overall task success varying from -19.4 to +8.3 points relative to no plan.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
Sep 18

How Do Agent Harnesses Create Value? Planning Information and Release Control in Stateful LLM Agents

The paper investigates how agent harnesses—specifically planning guidance, execution organization, and completion verification—affect performance in retail and airline pilot tasks. By comparing fixed, task‑specific plans to shuffled policy text of equal length, the study finds that fixed plans improve success rates by about 7 percentage points, especially on complex tasks. A read‑only verifier rejects a majority of invalid episodes while incurring minimal cost, and its impact varies with the penalty for erroneous acceptance, often matching the full planning‑plus‑verification benefit at a lower cost.

By Yukun Zhang, Kemu Xu, Yishen Chen