arXiv AI By Shobhan Roy (University of Iowa)

The Compiler May Read It, the Agent May Not: Keeping Part of a Research Code Away from a Coding Agent

Read the original on arXiv AI →

The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
Oct 16

Language-Based Agent Control

The paper introduces Language-Based Agent Control (LBAC), a programming model that extends static typing and runtime enforcement to agentic applications, ensuring that agent-generated programs are well‑typed before execution. LBAC allows agents to perform arbitrary side‑effect‑free computation and recursively invoke subagents while maintaining uniform policy enforcement across both agent and developer code. The authors demonstrate LBAC through case studies on I/O sandboxing, data provenance, and information‑flow control.

By Timothy Zhou, Loris D'Antoni, Nadia Polikarpova
arXiv AI
Sep 2

Scientific Agent Skills: A Library of Procedural Knowledge for Research Agents

The paper introduces Scientific Agent Skills, an open library of 163 procedural knowledge modules across 16 scientific domains such as genomics, cheminformatics, medical imaging, study design, and scientific communication. Each skill is organized as a directory containing a versioned, human‑readable instruction file, reference material, and runnable scripts, allowing a language‑model agent to load the appropriate procedure only when needed. The library is publicly licensed and hosted on GitHub, but the authors report no task‑level evaluation or host selection rate.

By Timothy Kassis, Vinayak Agarwal, Yuhuan He, Darshil Patel, Aubrey M. Brueckner
arXiv AI
Aug 26

Rebuild Dossier: Mechanically-Enforced Specs for Agentic App Rebuilds, and What Model-Tier Failures Reveal

The paper introduces rebuild‑dossier, an open‑source tool that locks an application’s real interface before code is written and enforces one‑test‑at‑a‑time building through automated checks. In experiments, a compliant agent failed a held‑back test while a rule‑breaking agent passed, showing that a passing test suite can be gamed. The study also demonstrates that the automated check mechanism, rather than interface‑locking alone, is crucial for reliable rebuilds, and that multi‑level verification catches errors that single‑level checks miss.

By Parker Fawcett