The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Machine Learning.
arXiv:2606. 29748v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The application of graph data in numerous disciplines raises the need for gathering and analyzing huge volumes of data, some of which is private and sensitive.
The paper evaluates privacy risks in graph neural networks enhanced by large language models (LLMs). Using a five‑stage framework, the authors test six real‑world text‑attributed graph datasets with 42 model configurations and six privacy attack methods across link, label, and membership inference threats. Results show that LLM‑enhanced GNNs are more vulnerable than shallow baselines, with semantic enrichment amplifying exploitable signals, and that differential privacy can reduce risk but at a significant cost to utility.
arXiv:2609.37972v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: As Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) are widely deployed as Machine Learning-as-a-Service (MLaaS) APIs, model stealing attacks have emerged as a critical...
arXiv:2511.10936v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Graph unlearning (GU) has emerged as a promising solution to comply with "the right to be forgotten" regulations by enabling the removal of s...
The paper introduces STAG, a stealthy trojan attack framework targeting Graph Foundation Models (GFMs) that operate on text‑attributed graphs (TAGs). STAG jointly generates graph triggers and soft‑prompt text cues so that both modalities converge to a malicious target class while keeping the trigger subgraph structurally similar to the original and the trigger text readable. Experiments on several TAG datasets and GFMs confirm that STAG achieves high attack success rates while remaining difficult to detect.
arXiv:2311.16139v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have become indispensable tools for learning from graph structured data, catering to various applications such a...