arXiv Machine Learning By Sadhika Malladi, Samy Jelassi, Dylan Foster, Jordan T. Ash, Akshay Krishnamurthy

TailSFT: Filtered Fine-Tuning Improves Post-Training Performance

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

TailSFT is a simple modification to supervised fine‑tuning that filters out already well‑modeled sequences, concentrating learning on the tail of the data distribution. On the OLMo‑3 7B model, this approach improves pass@16 performance on math and coding tasks by up to 17% absolute and yields up to 4% absolute gains in subsequent GRPO reinforcement‑learning runs, with only minimal computational overhead. The authors also provide a lightweight diagnostic to identify settings where TailSFT is most beneficial and argue for a stage‑aware development strategy that evaluates intermediate checkpoints by their support for later training.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 21

DORA: A Scalable Asynchronous Reinforcement Learning System for Language Model Training

arXiv:2604. 26256v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Reinforcement learning (RL) has become a critical paradigm for LLM post-training, yet the rollout phase -- accounting for 50--80% of total step time -- is bottlenecked by skewed generation: long-tailed trajectories indispensable for model performance block the entire training pipeline.

By Tianhao Hu, Xiangcheng Liu, Yuchun Miao, Youshao Xiao, Hongyu Zang, Yang Zheng, Xuan Huang, Jinrui Ding, Yufei Zhang, Yu Yang, Yi-Kai Zhang, Yueqing Sun, Chengcheng Han, Xiandi Ma, Wei Wang, Qi Gu, Yerui Sun, Yuchen Xie, Xunliang Cai