arXiv:2606. 04272v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The standard LLM training pipeline applies reinforcement learning (RL) only after pre-training and supervised fine-tuning (SFT).
By Rachit Bansal, Clara Mohri, Tian Qin, David Alvarez-Melis, Sham Kakade
arXiv:2606. 19047v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multi-turn tool-use RL is bottlenecked by the rapid depletion of informative samples in static datasets.
By Ruishan Fang, Siyuan Lu, Chenyi Zhuang, Tao Lin
arXiv:2607. 21971v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Test-time scaling through iterative self-evolution with environment feedback, as demonstrated by AlphaEvolve, shows remarkable performance gains.
By Shujin Wu, Cheng Qian, Xiusi Chen, Heng Ji
arXiv:2507. 15356v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Offline reinforcement learning (RL) learns policies from fixed datasets, thereby avoiding costly or unsafe environment interactions.
By Lu Guo, Yixiang Shan, Zhengbang Zhu, Qifan Liang, Lichang Song, Ting Long, Weinan Zhang, Yi Chang
arXiv:2609.37119v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Recent approaches to reinforcement learning (RL) post-training for large language models increasingly remove the critic to reduce training instabilit...
By Hongyang Li, Xiao Li, Caesar Wu, Said Mammar, Gr\'egoire Danoy, Pascal Bouvry
arXiv:2604. 26256v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Reinforcement learning (RL) has become a critical paradigm for LLM post-training, yet the rollout phase -- accounting for 50--80% of total step time -- is bottlenecked by skewed generation: long-tailed trajectories indispensable for model performance block the entire training pipeline.
By Tianhao Hu, Xiangcheng Liu, Yuchun Miao, Youshao Xiao, Hongyu Zang, Yang Zheng, Xuan Huang, Jinrui Ding, Yufei Zhang, Yu Yang, Yi-Kai Zhang, Yueqing Sun, Chengcheng Han, Xiandi Ma, Wei Wang, Qi Gu, Yerui Sun, Yuchen Xie, Xunliang Cai