arXiv:2606. 30573v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We introduce SWE-Interact, a new testbed for evaluating coding agents on multi-turn, interactive, user-driven software engineering tasks.
By Mohit Raghavendra, Anisha Gunjal, Aakash Sabharwal, Yunzhong He
AgentSWE is a new benchmark for agent software engineering that evaluates coding agents across three lifecycle stages: creating an agent from a natural‑language requirement, editing existing agent codebases, and optimizing toward a measurable target. The benchmark consists of 25 commission‑style tasks, where builders iterate on a few illustrative cases and are then tested on held‑out cases that cover the full requirement, with hard pass/fail gates or objective‑based grading. Experiments show that current coding agents fail to meet the requirements, revealing common failure modes such as overfitting, incomplete runtimes, and unsupported completion claims.
By Jiahao Wang, Hongjin Qian, Yuyang Hu, Jiajun Zhang, Zheng Liu
arXiv:2608. 09072v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language model-powered coding agents are increasingly used to modify existing code repositories, for example, by adding features or fixing bugs.
By Xin Zhou, Chun Yong Chong, Kisub Kim, Yun Peng, Rui Shu, Zihan Wu, Xu Han, Guowen Yuan, Zeyang Zhuang, Jounghoon Kim, Jeongjin Ju, Seongmin Ju, Taein Yoon, David Lo
arXiv:2609.37143v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Modern coding agents can deliver increasingly large repository-level changes, and recent benchmarks reflect this by emphasizing long-horizon tasks wi...
By Yun Peng, Zihan Wu, Zeyang Zhuang, Xin Zhou, Rui Shu, Xu Han, Chun Yong Chong, Yuan Wang, Jiakun Liu
Modern coding agents can deliver increasingly large repository-level changes, and recent benchmarks reflect this by emphasizing long-horizon tasks with large reference implementations. Many benchmarks...
The paper introduces ReqClarifyBench, an interactive benchmark for evaluating how well large language models (LLMs) can clarify vague user intent into clear requirements in repository-level software development. It includes 341 tasks across game, miniapp, and web development, each with a vague intent, a human-validated requirement document, and code evaluation artifacts, and uses LLM-based user simulators with diverse personas. The study evaluates six LLMs on clarification effectiveness and requirement quality, finding that stronger clarification does not always yield better documents, performance varies by persona, and coding-agent harnesses do not improve document quality over base LLMs.
By Mingyu Chen, Zhiqing Zhong, Manyi Wang, Linxi Liang, Rouyu Chen, Pinjia He