arXiv AI By Paul Wittlinger, Giacomo Acitelli, Anti Alman, Fabrizio Maria Maggi, Andrea Marrella

Supporting Autonomous Process Execution within a Multi-Perspective Constraint Frame via Numeric Planning

Read the original on arXiv AI →

arXiv:2607. 16738v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: AI-Augmented Business Process Management Systems (ABPMS) enhance traditional BPMS by leveraging advanced AI techniques to define, execute, and monitor complex process structures.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jun 25

A Process Harness for Uplifting Legacy Workflows to Agentic BPM: Design and Realization in CUGA FLO

We introduce the process harness, a new mechanism for uplifting legacy workflows into Agentic Business Process Management (Agentic BPM) without replacing the underlying workflow engine. A process harness places a policy-governed agentic layer around a deterministic workflow engine, intercepting designated control points to contribute reasoning, adaptation, and oversight while the engine retains structural authority over the process.

arXiv AI
Jun 10

Business World Model

arXiv:2606. 10044v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Businesses are increasingly adopting AI-enabled tools to improve productivity, reduce costs, and enhance products and services.

By Cecil Pang, Hiroki Sayama
arXiv AI
Sep 12

Planning and Scheduling Business Processes under Control-Flow Uncertainty: Extended Version

The paper addresses the challenge of scheduling business process activities when the exact sequence of required tasks is uncertain due to data‑driven decisions made during execution. It proposes framing the problem as a chance‑constrained optimization and introduces two formulations: a decomposed two‑stage approach (planning to minimize superfluous activities under a feasibility constraint, followed by scheduling to minimize makespan) and an integrated single‑stage approach. Experiments on two real‑world and one synthetic dataset show that the integrated method achieves better makespans but struggles with scalability, whereas the decomposed method scales to larger settings.

By Michel Kunkler, Stefanie Rinderle-Ma
arXiv AI
Sep 10

Planning and Scheduling Business Processes under Control-Flow Uncertainty

The paper addresses the challenge of scheduling business process activities when the exact sequence of required tasks is uncertain due to data-driven decisions made during execution. It proposes framing the problem as a chance-constrained optimization and introduces two formulations: a decomposed two-stage approach that first minimizes expected superfluous activities under a feasibility constraint and then schedules to minimize makespan, and an integrated approach that combines planning and scheduling into a single model. Experiments on two real-world and one synthetic dataset show that the integrated approach achieves better makespans but struggles with scalability, whereas the decomposed approach scales to larger settings.

By Michel Kunkler, Stefanie Rinderle-Ma