arXiv:2608. 16224v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: By leveraging large-scale pretraining, LLMs can interpret diverse temporal expressions and question formulations without task-specific training.
Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.
arXiv:2606. 01591v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The TimeLogic Challenge evaluates formal temporal-logic reasoning over video - 16 operators (before, after, until, since, always, co-occur, ordering, ...
arXiv:2607.22365v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: High-complexity operational environments require methods that characterize temporally distributed patterns rather than classify isolated events. Th...
The paper proposes PAIR, a method that treats reasoning paths of large language models as phase‑structured trajectories within each question. By sampling multiple trajectories per question, aligning them to shared relative phases, and comparing successful versus unsuccessful paths only within the same phase, PAIR isolates path‑quality signals from question‑level variation. Experiments show that standard correctness probes lose predictive power under this within‑question evaluation, while PAIR improves trajectory ranking, Best‑of‑N selection, and enables phase‑wise steering of generation outcomes.
arXiv:2609.16055v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Test-time compute has emerged as a major approach to improving the capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs). However, existing test-time reasonin...
arXiv:2609.22213v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Temporal Knowledge Graph Question Answering (TKGQA) requires answer inference from evidence that is both structurally valid and temporally admissible....
arXiv:2606. 12481v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong reasoning and instruction-following capabilities, making them potentially powerful tools for time-series analysis.