arXiv:2606. 10394v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models are increasingly used to power personal agents for everyday applications, but evaluating these agents remains a challenge.
Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.
Large language models are increasingly used to power personal agents for everyday applications, but evaluating these agents remains a challenge. Existing benchmarks still rely on sandboxed artifacts, static task design, and coarse scoring, which hinder scalability and limit progress toward reliable personal-agent evaluation.
arXiv:2604. 18543v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Constructing environments for training and evaluating claw-like agents remains a manual, human-intensive process that does not scale.
arXiv:2604. 13072v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: OpenClaw-style personal assistants extend LLM agents from isolated tool use to open-ended, stateful, and personalized software environments.
arXiv:2607. 13705v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: As Large Language Models (LLMs) evolve into autonomous agents, the need for unified evaluation infrastructure becomes critical.
arXiv:2609.06059v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: As large language models evolve from question-answering systems into general-purpose agents, evaluation must move beyond static answer correctness to a...
RealClawBench is a live benchmark framework derived from real OpenClaw developer‑agent sessions, designed to capture the distribution, diversity, and real‑world difficulty of deployed agent use. It reconstructs execution environments and uses deterministic verifiable scorers to convert real sessions into reproducible, automatically scored tasks, yielding 281 executable tasks with minimal distribution shift. Evaluation of 14 contemporary models shows the best system solves only 65.8% of tasks, highlighting significant room for improvement on realistic workloads.