arXiv:2607. 03999v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Estimating heterogeneous treatment effects (CATE) requires simultaneously detecting effect modification and quantifying estimation uncertainty.
By Pantelis Z. Hadjipantelis, Josephine Chiang, Karthik Nagesh
arXiv:2609.17238v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: High-dimensional data create challenges for causal effect estimation because identifying the covariates needed for correct model specification become...
By Muwon Kwon, Peter M. Steiner
The study evaluates how different molecular feature spaces—Morgan fingerprints, RDKit physicochemical descriptors, and SMILES bigrams—affect the prediction of blood‑brain barrier permeability using various learning algorithms. Dynamic Random Forests with combined features achieved the best performance (mean AUC 0.970). When applying Generalized Random Forests to estimate heterogeneous effects of LogP on BBB permeability, orthogonalization revealed that apparent heterogeneity largely vanished after accounting for confounding, shifting importance toward residual SMILES bigram information.
By Tshemollo Rapolai, Seite Makgai, Mohammad Arashi
arXiv:2506. 13107v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Causal forests estimate how treatment effects vary across individuals, guiding personalized interventions in areas like marketing, operations, and public policy.
By Yanfang Hou, Carlos Fern\'andez-Lor\'ia
arXiv:2609.06294v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Estimating conditional average treatment effects (CATE) enables efficient targeting of interventions, but many applications have limited experimental s...
By Maitreyi Swaroop, Shikha Bhat, Samantha Rodriguez, Tamar Krishnamurti, Bryan Wilder
arXiv:2601. 20819v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Machine learning predictions are increasingly used to supplement incomplete or costly-to-measure outcomes in fields such as biomedical research, environmental science, and social science.
By Yilin Song, Dan M. Kluger, Harsh Parikh, Tian Gu