arXiv AI By Amritesh Banerjee

Spectral Dynamics of Semantic Drift in Clinical Multi-Agent Language Model Networks

Read the original on arXiv AI →

arXiv:2607. 22758v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The integration of iterative LLMs within multi-agent diagnostic frameworks requires a rigorous quantitative reevaluation of underlying communication topologies.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
Sep 3

Agents That Model Agents: Five Principles Toward a Theory of Mind for 6G Networks

The paper proposes that future 6G networks will use Large Language Model agents to manage the Radio Access Network, but current designs mistakenly treat inter‑agent messages as objective facts. It argues that messages are actually traces of the sender’s reasoning, carrying subjective conclusions that can propagate hallucinations and cause outages. By modeling these interactions as cognitive channels on a cellular sheaf, the authors derive five design principles—treating messages as evidence of hidden reasoning, defining trust as a continuous cognitive Signal‑to‑Noise Ratio, computing network consistency via the sheaf’s Laplacian, limiting peer‑modeling to two levels, and bounding credible capacity by goal alignment—and validate them with a signaling‑storm study on 1B‑parameter telecom language models.

By Hatim Chergui, Carolina Fern\'{a}ndez-Mart\'{i}nez, Mehdi Bennis, Merouane Debbah
arXiv AI
Aug 13

Local verification cannot detect non-transportability: a cohomological theory of context preservation in agentic reasoning

arXiv:2608. 11252v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Agentic AI systems routinely transport conclusions across biological, clinical and financial contexts, and the emerging safeguard is local verification: checking at each step that the entity is representable in the chosen tool, that parameters are compatible, and that outputs cohere with the plan.

By Suyash Mishra