arXiv:2607. 25790v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: This paper proposes a novel physics-guided spectral deep operator network, termed SpectONet, for solving Euler-Bernoulli beam (EBB) vibration problems.
Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.
arXiv:2609.07983v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) have recently emerged as a promising approach for solving Partial Differential Equations (PDEs), offering a me...
arXiv:2512. 09165v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Deep Operator Networks (DeepONets) have emerged as a powerful framework for data-driven operator learning, providing flexible surrogates for nonlinear mappings arising in partial differential equations (PDEs).
arXiv:2608. 06894v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Neural operators have become a central tool for solving partial differential equations (PDEs), with spectral operators offering efficient global mixing across spatial locations.
Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) provide a meshless approach for solving partial differential equations (PDEs), but suffer severe degradation in stiff and shock-dominated problems, where small PDE residuals can correspond to globally inaccurate solutions. We show these failures are multi-causal, arising from the concurrent interplay of (i) spectral bias against sharp features, (ii) imbalanced multi-term optimization and loss-weight collapse, (iii) violation of temporal causality, and (iv) under-resolved collocation.
arXiv:2607. 04407v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Repeated prediction of acoustic fields from spatially distributed boundary excitation is computationally expensive when each source realization requires a new wave simulation.
The paper introduces StablePDENet, a physics-informed adversarial training framework that regularizes the residual sensitivity of neural operators to improve stability against input perturbations. The method formulates operator learning as a min–max optimization, where a physics-based projected‑gradient adversary generates perturbations and the outer objective combines the attacked physics loss with a normalized residual‑sensitivity penalty. Experiments on benchmark problems show that StablePDENet outperforms PI‑DeepONet and its adversarial variant in accuracy under adversarial attacks while maintaining competitive performance on clean data, and it also enhances generalization and highlights the distinction between model sensitivity and intrinsic operator ill‑conditioning.