arXiv:2508. 09883v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) demonstrate remarkable reasoning capabilities in tasks such as algorithmic coding and mathematical problem-solving.
By Xiaojun Wu, Xiaoguang Jiang, Huiyang Li, Jucai Zhai, Dengfeng Liu, Qiaobo Hao, Huang Liu, Zhiguo Yang, Ji Xie, Ninglun Gu, Jin Yang, Kailai Zhang, Yelun Bao, Jun Wang
Post-training of reasoning language models is commonly driven by supervised distillation and reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards. Distillation often relies on chain-of-thought annotations that are expensive to obtain and may themselves be noisy, incomplete, or partially incorrect; even when the final solution is correct, an imperfect rationale can interfere with learning.
arXiv:2608. 19408v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: On-policy distillation (OPD) has emerged as an effective framework for post-training language models by pairing student-generated trajectories with dense token-level supervision from a teacher.
By Chen Yang, Haiyuan Wan, Rengrong Xiong, Yize Chen, Danny H. K. Tsang
arXiv:2606. 11209v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Visual question answering increasingly requires multi-step reasoning.
By Jingpei Wu, Xiao Han, Weixiang Shen, Boer Zhang, Zifeng Ding, Volker Tresp
CanvasAnneal is a curriculum‑guided reinforcement learning framework designed to improve Diffusion Language Models (DLMs) on complex reasoning and tool‑use tasks. It starts training by injecting reasoning traces from a stronger teacher model into the diffusion canvas, then gradually reduces this guidance so the model learns to generate reasoning independently. Experiments on mathematical reasoning and tool‑use benchmarks show that CanvasAnneal outperforms standard diffusion RL methods such as diffu‑GRPO on tasks like MATH500, Countdown, and Tau2, and accelerates reward improvement, though the gains vary by task.
By Blake Olson, Yuhang Song, Emmett McQuinn, Yuan Shangguan
arXiv:2604. 09482v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Reasoning in knowledge-intensive domains remains challenging as intermediate steps are often not locally verifiable: unlike math or code, evaluating step correctness may require synthesizing clues across large external knowledge sources.
By Jiwoong Sohn, Tomasz Sternal, Kenneth Styppa, Torsten Hoefler, Michael Moor