arXiv:2601. 00181v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We address two persistent gaps in Emotion Recognition in Conversation: which modeling choices materially affect performance, and how recognition findings connect to interpretable discourse-level patterns.
By Cheonkam Jeong, Adeline Nyamathi
arXiv:2606. 26987v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Recent work identified emotion vectors in Claude Sonnet 4.
By Sinie van der Ben, Rapha\"el Baur, Yannick Metz, Mennatallah El-Assady
The paper investigates how large language models (LLMs) handle affective state reasoning, a type of implicit conversational state that persists across topic shifts. It introduces Self‑targeted Internal Attention Boosting (SIAB), a method that identifies and amplifies sparse affective attention heads using causal localization and the model’s own behavior, without relying on external labels. Experiments on ECC and GoEmotions datasets across multiple LLMs and prompting settings show that SIAB improves macro‑F1 scores by up to +10.3 points on ECC and +5.5 on GoEmotions, and further gains are achieved when combined with external supervision.
By Wenqiu Tang, Zhen Wan, Yihui Wang, Takahiro Komamizu, Ichiro Ide
Sofroniew et al. (2026) showed that emotion concepts in Claude Sonnet 4.5 are encoded as vectors whose geometry mirrors human affect psychology. This study replicates that finding using the base pretrained model google/gemma-2-27b, generating 205,200 Claude Sonnet 4.5 stories, extracting 171 emotion vectors, and recovering a similar affective circumplex with principal components explaining comparable variance. The analysis further identifies a sharp geometric seam at layers 22‑26, demonstrates that much of the geometry already exists in static token embeddings, and shows that the geometry predicts token‑level co‑activation with high correlation.
By Adam Hollowell
arXiv:2508.05880v3 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Understanding human emotions is central to user-facing AI applications, safety alignment, and the simulation of human behavior. As emotional...
By Sree Bhattacharyya, Evgenii Kuriabov, Lucas Craig, Tharun Dilliraj, Reginald B. Adams, Jr., Jia Li, James Z. Wang
The paper investigates whether the layer that yields the highest probing accuracy in omni‑modal large language models is also the most effective for steering interventions. Across three independently developed models, the authors find that the best probing layers differ widely, whereas the most steerable layers consistently lie in a narrow mid‑to‑late range of the network. Using emotion as a testbed, they demonstrate a significant causal gap between probing and steering, and propose a two‑factor account linking readability and downstream plasticity to steering effectiveness.
By Yibo Wang, Jisheng Dang, Bimei Wang, Yitao Wu, Wencan Zhang, Hong Peng, Jizhao Liu, Bin Hu, Qi Tian, Tat-Seng Chua