Some Dialects Are More Equal Than Others: Non-Prestigious Arabic Dialectal Bias in LLMs
Read the original on arXiv Computation and Language →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Computation and Language.
The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Computation and Language.
Previous work on Egyptian Arabic in NLP has focused largely on the prestigious Cairene Egyptian Arabic (CEA) dialect, resulting in a lack of representation for the less prestigious Sa'idi Egyptian Ara...
The study investigates whether Modern Standard Arabic (MSA) dominates internal representations in large language models (LLMs) when generating Arabic, even if prompted with dialectal forms. By extending a language-dominance framework to 26 Arabic varieties, the authors find no evidence that MSA serves as a dominant internal representation; instead, dialect representations are densely overlapping, with mutual information dropping sharply compared to more distinct languages. The strongest separability effects vary across layers and architectures, indicating that generation bias toward MSA does not necessarily reflect internal representational dominance.
arXiv:2609.22796v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Dialectal Arabic machine translation (MT) remains challenging despite recent progress in Arabic language technologies, particularly because effective t...
This study evaluates large language models (LLMs) for English‑to‑dialectal Arabic machine translation using the MADAR dataset across 16 Arabic dialects, covering both translation directions. It compares specialized Arabic models (Jais, Nile), multilingual models (Gemma, Command‑R, Mistral, Aya), and commercial APIs (GPT‑4.1) with multiple metrics—BLEU, CHRF, COMET, GEMBA—and a small manual assessment. The authors also examine LLMs’ ability to classify dialects and discuss challenges in automatic MT evaluation for Arabic dialects, noting potential training data contamination.
The paper investigates how Arabic dialects are represented in large language models and whether they can be steered at inference time. By analyzing neuron-level sparsity and vector steering, the authors find that only a small fraction of neurons encode dialect-specific features, while distributed activation directions are more effective for steering. Vector steering can induce dialectal output from both dialectal and MSA prompts, whereas neuron steering works only when the prompt is already dialectal.
arXiv:2611.06517v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The massive permeability of intelligent systems in every sphere of human activities have greatly enhanced clarity, ease of work, and increased general...