arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 24

SoLiD26: A First Principles Solid-Liquid Interface Dataset for Machine-learned Interatomic Potentials

SoLiD26 is a curated dataset of 15.4 million first‑principles atomic structures for solid‑liquid interfaces, comprising up to 576 atoms and 15 chemical elements. The data were generated from density functional theory calculations, mainly ab initio molecular dynamics, and include aqueous coinage metal interfaces, electrode‑electrolyte systems, and bulk references. Each record contains atomic species, positions, cell parameters, periodic boundary conditions, potential energy, and atomic forces, all computed with VASP using the PBE functional and D3 dispersion corrections.

By Jonas Busk, Emil J. P. Frost, Yogeshwaran Krishnan, Henrik H. Kristoffersen, August E. G. Mikkelsen, Xueping Qin, Xin Yang, Heine A. Hansen, Arghya Bhowmik, Tejs Vegge
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 16

Distilling latent electrostatics from foundation machine learning interatomic potentials

arXiv:2606. 15001v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Foundation machine learning interatomic potentials (MLIPs) have enabled atomistic simulations across broad regions of chemical and materials space, but many remain computationally expensive and lack explicit electrostatics, limiting their use for systems governed by long-range interactions and electrical response.

By Xiaoyu Wang, Bingqing Cheng
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 2

Benchmark Dataset for Catalysis on 2D MXenes

arXiv:2606. 00794v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Merging first-principles calculations with machine learning (ML), we aim to accelerate the exploration of catalytic behaviour in novel materials.

By Pavlo Melnyk, Anmar Karmush, M{\aa}rten Wadenb\"ack, Ania Beatriz Rodr\'iguez-Barrera, Johanna Rosen, Michael Felsberg, Jonas Bj\"ork
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 27

A Hierarchical Synergistic Deep Learning Framework Integrating Composition, Structure, and Ionic Transport for Solid-State Electrolyte Discovery

The paper presents a hierarchical deep‑learning framework that integrates compositional, structural, and transport models to screen solid‑state electrolytes. Four modules—L‑G‑DCNN, DenseGNN, MatterSim, and DeePMD—coordinate to evaluate thermodynamics, multi‑property performance, and kinetic transport, outperforming existing methods. Applied to over 30 million candidates, the workflow identifies 97 high‑performance materials, mainly halides, and links Li⁺ jump‑network connectivity to ionic conductivity while highlighting limits for oxide electrolytes.

By Hongwei Du, Dingyang Lv, Baole Wei, Yongheng Li, Feng Yu, Ziheng Lu, Siqi Shi, Hong Wang