arXiv Machine Learning By Tengwei Song, Robert Hoehndorf

Soft Ontology Priors over Latent Concept Posteriors for Weakly Supervised Neuro-Symbolic Learning

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

The paper introduces a method that injects a soft ontology prior into the training objective of weakly supervised neuro-symbolic predictors, aiming to prevent reasoning shortcuts that make latent concepts unidentifiable. By compiling the prior with the task constraint into a smooth probabilistic circuit, the authors show that the resulting structured concept posterior can be efficiently computed and that noisy expert axioms only redistribute prior mass without eliminating valid concept support. Theoretical analysis demonstrates bounded log‑density perturbations under axiom noise, while experiments on a real‑world driving benchmark and controlled tasks validate the approach.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

arXiv AI
Aug 19

Neuro-symbolic learning over OWL 2 DL via consequence-based compilation to differentiable circuits

Baobab compiles an OWL 2 DL (ΣROIQ) ontology with a finite ABox into a Sentential Decision Diagram (SDD), saturating a propositional core and instantiating remaining DL features over the active domain. The resulting evidence‑conditioned weighted model count trains a perception network to recognize real images under partial ABox supervision, enabling a CNN to recover latent ontology concepts that an independent perception would miss. When supervision allows multiple ontology‑consistent completions, Baobab’s mixture indexed by query justifications represents the calibrated posterior, achieving Bayes‑optimal performance on a real‑image MNIST task where single‑WMC and learned mixtures fail, thereby characterizing and mitigating reasoning shortcuts in a non‑Horn description logic.

By Olga Mashkova, Asaad Mohammedsaleh, Fernando Zhapa-Camacho, Robert Hoehndorf
arXiv AI
Oct 31

Decompose, Don't Expand: Capability-Independent AI Systems by Construction

The paper argues that many AI tasks can be split into a deterministic core and a fuzzy residue, and that decomposing tasks rather than expanding models yields a property called parity by construction—where model‑size no longer affects performance on the deterministic sub‑tasks. Across nine models ranging from 494 M to Opus‑class size, the authors show that once the deterministic context is resolved, operation selection and selector resolution scores become identical, while a non‑decomposable task (labelling) remains sensitive to model size. They present a general method for identifying decomposition points, constructing deterministic surfaces and grammars, and ensuring safe residues, and demonstrate the approach in physics, motion retargeting, object‑model editing, and a Web‑CLI tool. whyItMatters":"The study demonstrates that task decomposition can eliminate the need for model scaling or fine‑tuning, offering a systematic design discipline applicable across diverse AI domains."

By Tejaswi Gowda