arXiv:2606. 04401v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The capabilities of large language models (LLMs) significantly depend on training data drawn from various domains.
By Jiaxing Wang, Deping Xiang, Jin Xu, Mingyang Yi, Guoqiang Gong, Zicheng Zhang, Haoran Li, Pengzhang Liu, Zhen Chen, Ke Zhang, Ju Fan, Qixiang Jiang
arXiv:2606. 01062v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) models have become a leading approach for decoupling parameter count from computational cost in large language models, yet effectively scaling MoE performance remains a challenge.
By Jiarui Feng, Hanqing Zeng, Karish Grover, Ruizhong Qiu, Yinglong Xia, Qiang Zhang, Qifan Wang, Ren Chen, Dongqi Fu, Jiayi Liu, Zhoukai Zhao, Xiangjun Fan, Benyu Zhang, Yixin Chen
The article proposes treating large language model (LLM) data mixing as a classical mixture experiment, where data domains are components, token shares are proportions, and proxy-training runs serve as design points. Using sparse second‑order Scheffé response‑surface models, the authors construct model‑robust Σ‑optimal designs that efficiently identify optimal data mixtures and reveal strong interaction effects, especially between weak domains and web‑derived text. Empirical results on RegMix show that these designs recover mixture rankings while reducing proxy runs by about 25%, demonstrating that data mixing can be optimized through experimental design rather than solely prediction.
By Yicheng Mao, Hongru Du
Sparsely activated Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) language models contain substantial structured redundancy among routed experts, but pruning them without downstream calibration data remains challenging. Existing expert-pruning methods typically rely on a single aggregated importance score, which can bias the retained set toward experts favored by dominant calibration patterns.
arXiv:2506. 07673v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Large language model (LLM) evaluation is increasingly costly, prompting interest in methods that speed up evaluation by shrinking benchmark datasets.
By Guanhua Zhang, Florian E. Dorner, Moritz Hardt
ReForge is a bilevel optimization framework that refines merged models by treating module-wise refinement as Bayesian linear regression with an anchor-centered prior. The inner level produces a closed‑form MAP estimate from unlabeled calibration activations, while the outer level employs Bayesian optimization to jointly select regularization strengths and assembly scales using validation data. A data‑free variant replaces activation statistics with task‑vector Grams, enabling refinement without calibration examples, and across extensive vision and language benchmarks ReForge consistently outperforms existing plug‑and‑play anchor baselines, achieving significant accuracy gains on large‑scale tasks such as 20‑task ViT‑B/32 and eight‑task ViT‑L/14.
By Kaiyang Li, Shaobo Han, Qing Su, Shihao Ji