arXiv AI By Aniruddha Tamhane, Raghavendra Addanki, Ayushi Aggarwal, Aditya Bansal, Rui Wang, Charles Menguy, Swati Jain

Skill-based Agentic Evaluation for Real-time Data Science Tasks

Read the original on arXiv AI →

The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
4d ago

CARGO: Context-Aware Retrieval-Gated Evaluation of Agentic AI in Production

CARGO is a framework for evaluating agentic AI systems in production that addresses the problem of reference-instance divergence (RID), where reference-based judges penalize correct answers that involve different entity identifiers. It treats retrieved references as procedural exemplars, grounds judgments in the live instance’s context, assigns a three-way status to claims, and gates evaluation by retrieval confidence. Using the CARGO-Bench diagnostic suite, CARGO eliminates false penalties and improves discrimination while revealing a limitation in detecting procedural corruptions.

By Mukul Chhabra, Shail Patel, Luigi Medrano
arXiv AI
Sep 7

TruthInsightBench: An Evidence-Grounded Benchmark for Automated Evaluation of Open-Ended Scientific Discovery Agents

TruthInsightBench is a new benchmark designed to evaluate automated scientific discovery agents by presenting them with 40 blind tasks drawn from peer‑reviewed studies across ten domains. Each task provides only a neutral objective and frozen data, withholding source conclusions, expected values, and analysis paths, forcing agents to determine which claim the data support. A fixed LLM‑based judge scores agents on evidentiary maturity across six dimensions, using 29 artifact‑grounded items, enabling fully automated, repeatable evaluation without human grading.

By Zhibo Yang, Chen Zhang, Yuewei Zhang, Hao Wang
arXiv AI
Jun 2

BADGER: Bridging Agentic and Deterministic Evaluation for Generative Enterprise Reasoning

arXiv:2606. 02109v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Enterprise AI systems that translate natural language into SQL queries and orchestrate multi-step agentic reasoning pipelines require evaluation approaches fundamentally different from academic benchmarks.

By Shannon Serrao, Soumitra Chatterjee, Dorina Strori, Abhishek Sharma, Nathan Miller