arXiv AI By Ruiqi Zhang, Jiahao Wang, Mingxuan Li, Haichen Luo, Chaoting Wang, Guoyu Mou, Keyu Lai, Hanchao Lv, Jiaxu Wang, Yibo Zheng, Aijun Yang, Xiaohua Wang

SimuVerity: Benchmarking Agents for Engineering-Grade Simulink Model Generation

Read the original on arXiv AI →

SimuVerity is a new benchmark that evaluates text-to-executable Simulink model-generation tasks across ten engineering domains, using 101 tasks that include executable-system profiles and native simulation scenarios. The benchmark employs a hierarchical evaluator that first checks artifact delivery, native executability, and engineering qualification, then scores qualified models on six dimensions such as accuracy, output quality, mechanistic fidelity, control and causal integrity, operating-domain robustness, and dynamic response. In tests of six agent systems, the best achieved only a 42.86 overall score, revealing that structural similarity is a poor proxy for engineering performance and that high-scoring models can still have severe visual-layout disorder.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
Aug 26

Beyond Executable Models: The Pufibara Agent Harness and the Modelica Agent Workflow Benchmark for Physical System Modeling

The paper introduces Pufibara, an agent harness designed to maintain engineering state and evidence across revisions in Modelica-based physical system modeling. It also presents a 232-task Modelica Agent Workflow Benchmark covering model repair, generation, and tuning, evaluated by an external benchmark-owned evaluator. Experiments show Pufibara outperforms Claude Code in task success and resource efficiency across two LLM backends.

By Zizhe Wang
arXiv AI
Sep 30

From Dead Code and Static Requirements to Working Engines: Software Revival with Coding Agents

The paper introduces ReviveBench, a benchmark designed to evaluate coding agents’ ability to revive non‑running software and reconstruct industrial engines from open specifications. It comprises two families of tasks—revival (ten tasks addressing dependency issues, missing modules, legacy builds, and GPU models) and reconstruction (thirteen tasks covering numerical, geometric, hardware, and transactional systems). The benchmark uses hidden verifiers calibrated against native environments, engineering tools, or reference implementations, and the authors report that the strongest evaluated model passes all revival tasks and most reconstruction tasks, while also uncovering verifier defects that highlight measurement error in executable verification.

By Tianyu Liu, Dingyuan Dai, Yufan Du, Zhen Yang
arXiv AI
Aug 26

EngiAI: Capability-Based Evaluation of Tool-Connected LLM Agents for Engineering Design

EngiAI introduces a capability-based evaluation framework for tool-connected engineering agents, assessing workflow execution, retrieval-assisted parameter selection, HPC orchestration, and training-code authoring using execution traces and engineering artifacts. The framework was applied to four LLM backends on EngiBench Beams2D and Photonics2D, revealing that proprietary models outperform open-source ones in workflow completion and HPC orchestration, while indexed retrieval improves parameter selection. The study demonstrates that evaluating distinct skills separately provides clearer insight into failure mechanisms than end-to-end success rates alone.

By Gioele Molinari, Florian Felten, Soheyl Massoudi, Mark Fuge
arXiv AI
Oct 16

Harness-Bench: Evaluating Agent Harnesses across Models and Realistic Workflows

Harness-Bench is a diagnostic benchmark that evaluates how different harness configurations affect LLM agent performance in realistic workflows. It tests 106 sandboxed offline tasks across multiple model backends, recording artifacts, execution traces, and usage statistics to analyze completion, process quality, efficiency, and failure behavior. The study finds significant variation in outcomes across model-harness pairings, indicating that agent capability should be reported at the configuration level rather than solely by the base model.

By Yilun Yao, Xinyu Tan, Chao-Hsuan Liu, Yaoming Li, Zhengyang Wang, Zongwei Lv, Wenhan Yu, Zhewen Tan, Yuxuan Tian, Lin Sun, Xiangzheng Zhang, Guangxiang Zhao, Tong Yang